1993
DOI: 10.1002/nme.1620361603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patch recovery based on superconvergent derivatives and equilibrium

Abstract: SUMMARYIn this paper a postprocessing technique is developed for determining first-order derivatives (fluxes, stresses) at nodal points based on derivatives in superconvergent points. It is an extension of the superconvergent patch recovery technique presented by Zienkiewicz and Zhu. In contrast to that technique all flux or stress components are interpolated at the same time, coupled by equilibrium equations at the superconvergent points. The equilibrium equations and use of one order higher degree of interpo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
67
0
2

Year Published

1993
1993
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 152 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
67
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In general they couple the stress components in order to be able to add constraints that improve the quality of the recovered field. Wiberg and Abdulwahab [45,25] proposed to take into account the equilibrium of the recovered field by using a penalty method, Blacker and Belytschko [26] introduced the "Conjoint Polynomial Enhancement" to improve the recovered field along the boundaries. Other techniques looking for equilibrated recovered solutions for upper bounding purposes can be found in [46,47,48,49], but always presenting small lacks of equilibrium even at patch level, thus preventing the strict upper bound property.…”
Section: Finite Element Discretizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general they couple the stress components in order to be able to add constraints that improve the quality of the recovered field. Wiberg and Abdulwahab [45,25] proposed to take into account the equilibrium of the recovered field by using a penalty method, Blacker and Belytschko [26] introduced the "Conjoint Polynomial Enhancement" to improve the recovered field along the boundaries. Other techniques looking for equilibrated recovered solutions for upper bounding purposes can be found in [46,47,48,49], but always presenting small lacks of equilibrium even at patch level, thus preventing the strict upper bound property.…”
Section: Finite Element Discretizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, it is well known that the main drawback of recovery type techniques is the lack of accuracy along the boundaries of the domain. Further improvements to the SPR technique have been introduced [24][25][26][27] in order to prevent the lack of accuracy of the smoothed field along the boundaries of the domain and also to increase the accuracy into the domain.…”
Section: Smoothing Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Error estimators based on recovery methods are given in [33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44]. Here we focus on the superconvergent patch-recovery technique [40][41][42][43][44].…”
Section: Error Estimators Based On Smoothening Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we focus on the superconvergent patch-recovery technique [40][41][42][43][44]. The element error-indicators for elements of any degree p are …”
Section: Error Estimators Based On Smoothening Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation