2022
DOI: 10.1080/03066150.2021.2009461
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patagonian ground rules: institutionalizing access at the frontier

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The initial dispossession of such lands for environmental conservation, such as Indigenous displacement or squatter removal, may actually take place long before—though not separately from—the subsequent economic exploitation (Kelly, 2011). The history of Patagonia has centered around its “stabilization as a state space through the production of property” (Rasmussen and Figueroa, 2022, 2), a scenario that has characterized its formation as a settler and then a conservation frontier. Across the region, recently intensifying alliances linking capital, state, and civil society actors have consolidated a development model based on commodifying and consuming wilderness, connecting nation‐building and natural heritage with the rise of green productivism.…”
Section: Nation‐building and The Transformation Of Wilderness Into Na...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initial dispossession of such lands for environmental conservation, such as Indigenous displacement or squatter removal, may actually take place long before—though not separately from—the subsequent economic exploitation (Kelly, 2011). The history of Patagonia has centered around its “stabilization as a state space through the production of property” (Rasmussen and Figueroa, 2022, 2), a scenario that has characterized its formation as a settler and then a conservation frontier. Across the region, recently intensifying alliances linking capital, state, and civil society actors have consolidated a development model based on commodifying and consuming wilderness, connecting nation‐building and natural heritage with the rise of green productivism.…”
Section: Nation‐building and The Transformation Of Wilderness Into Na...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the late nineteenth century, Indigenous societies were subjugated and cleared out for settler colonists through the so‐called ‘Conquest of the Desert’ in Argentina (Briones and Delrio, 2002) and the ‘Pacification of Araucania’ in Chile to the north of Patagonia proper (Klubock, 2014). Complex processes of land allocation and property rights followed military violence and led to the creation of agricultural, forestry, shipping, and export markets (Edwards, 2022; Klubock, 2014; Ogden, 2021; Rasmussen and Figueroa, 2023). Later, the creation of parks led to the eviction of settlers from some of these new conservation spaces.…”
Section: History Of the Conservation Frontiermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Patagonian conservation frontier, in the first instance, refers historically to the process whereby the contested Andean borderlands were remade through territorialization projects-the creation of a series of national parks-to make these zones legible to both state and capital. The frontier imaginary-the borderlands as a zone of statelessness and disputed sovereignty-was elaborated in relation to the conservation projects inaugurated in the early twentieth century (Rasmussen and Figueroa, 2023).…”
Section: History Of the Conservation Frontiermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Frontiers act in successive waves (or ‘regimes’), with each wave flowing from the propulsion of those before it (Kronenburg García et al, 2022). Accordingly, land control strategies are not applied on a clean slate, but rather build on and influence one another (Rasmussen & Figueroa, 2022). Which is applied, and to what effect, will thus depend not only on the particular assemblage of actors at a given frontier moment but also on the institutional and politico‐cultural debris left behind by previous struggles (Bastos Lima & Kmoch, 2021; Greco, 2015; Kronenburg García et al, 2022; Rasmussen & Lund, 2018).…”
Section: Some Considerations On Strategizationmentioning
confidence: 99%