2013
DOI: 10.1021/op300319t
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PAT-Enabled Determination of Design Space for Seeded Cooling Crystallization

Abstract: A simple and practical procedure to facilitate the determination of the design space for seeded cooling crystallization is proposed and demonstrated. Solute supersaturation is used as an effective link between six operational process factors and a chosen critical quality attribute, namely, fines fraction in the crystal product. A semi-mechanistic process model is developed, which accounts for the dynamics of supersaturation via moments of particle size distribution. ATR-FTIR and FBRM data from three batches fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Characterization of Unmilled Cocrystals. Before the milling experiments, the CA−GA cocrystals obtained by seeded cooling crystallization 22 were analyzed by PXRD to confirm that they belonged to Form II. As shown in Figure 1, the PXRD pattern of the unmilled crystals corresponded to that of Form II.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Characterization of Unmilled Cocrystals. Before the milling experiments, the CA−GA cocrystals obtained by seeded cooling crystallization 22 were analyzed by PXRD to confirm that they belonged to Form II. As shown in Figure 1, the PXRD pattern of the unmilled crystals corresponded to that of Form II.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prior knowledge and understanding of crystallization accumulated over the years, , when combined with Design of Experiment (DoE) studies, afford efficient identification of critical process parameters and determination of the design space for tight particle size control in some processes on the bench scale. , Scale-up effects may be one of the biggest obstacles to achieving consistent particle size control in crystallization. It is not a surprise that the optimal conditions determined on the bench scale, when translated to larger vessels according to some criteria, fail to produce crystals in the target particle size range.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model predictions are generally in good agreement with measured values, aside from a significant broadening of measured PSD as compared to predicted for plant batch 4. This batch was agitated at a higher rate than the first three batches (105 rpm for batch 4, as compared to 75 rpm for batches 1–3), which may have resulted in an increased number of fines, unaccounted for in the prediction because of omission of crystal breakage from the model . The predicted PSD also underestimates the fraction of larger particles for this batch.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This batch was agitated at a higher rate than the first three batches (105 rpm for batch 4, as compared to 75 rpm for batches 1−3), which may have resulted in an increased number of fines, unaccounted for in the prediction because of omission of crystal breakage from the model. 35 The predicted PSD also underestimates the fraction of larger particles for this batch. This could be an indication that the model overpredicts the impact of agitator rpm on PSD for this particular vessel configuration, but additional batches prepared in this reactor with different rpm would be needed to confirm this.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%