2015
DOI: 10.2134/agronmonogr15.c29
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pasture Production and Utilization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Research has compared mixed legume‐grass pastures to monoculture grasses and reported greater nutritive values and potential milk production for legume containing pastures (Zemenchik et al, 2002), and higher legume sward percentage lowers fiber concentration, and increases protein concentration, animal performance, and gain ha −1 (Mouriño et al, 2003). Increased nutritive value and animal performance of mixed grass‐legume pastures compared to grass pastures undoubtedly have a favorable economic impact, but the ability of legumes to remain in the pasture under grazing is often limited (Van Keuren and Matches, 1988; Forde et al, 1989). Hoveland et al (1990) demonstrated that interseeding legumes into TF monocultures increased the nutritive value of available forage, and steers grazing a TF–white clover pasture had greater body weight gain and reduced production cost than those grazing monocultures of TF in Georgia pastures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research has compared mixed legume‐grass pastures to monoculture grasses and reported greater nutritive values and potential milk production for legume containing pastures (Zemenchik et al, 2002), and higher legume sward percentage lowers fiber concentration, and increases protein concentration, animal performance, and gain ha −1 (Mouriño et al, 2003). Increased nutritive value and animal performance of mixed grass‐legume pastures compared to grass pastures undoubtedly have a favorable economic impact, but the ability of legumes to remain in the pasture under grazing is often limited (Van Keuren and Matches, 1988; Forde et al, 1989). Hoveland et al (1990) demonstrated that interseeding legumes into TF monocultures increased the nutritive value of available forage, and steers grazing a TF–white clover pasture had greater body weight gain and reduced production cost than those grazing monocultures of TF in Georgia pastures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, this fear of bloat makes farmers graze more mature alfalfa, when forage quality is much lower. Feeding overmature alfalfa forage usually results in greater economic losses from low beef cattle weight gain or dairy milk production than the potential losses from bloat itself (Van Keuren & Marten, 1972).…”
Section: Alfalfa Systems Management Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perhaps, but other factors likely are involved. An additional factor is the practice of grazing alfalfa fields, sometimes in combination with mechanical harvest, in many areas of the US (16). Pasture yields are not included in the Census and Survey figures.…”
Section: Census Of Agriculturementioning
confidence: 99%