2013
DOI: 10.4324/9780203105979
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pastoralism and Development in Africa

Abstract: Once again, the Horn of Africa has been in the headlines. And once again the news has been bad: drought, famine, conflict, hunger, suffering and death. The finger of blame has been pointed in numerous directions: at the changing climate, at environmental degradation, at overpopulation, at geopolitics and conflict, at aid agency failures, and more. But it is not all disaster and catastrophe. Many successful development efforts at 'the margins' often remain hidden, informal, sometimes illegal; and rarely in line… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 198 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Contrary to the persistent claims that pastoralism as a system of production and way of life is no longer viable, pastoralism continues, although in many new forms [24].…”
Section: Bibliographymentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Contrary to the persistent claims that pastoralism as a system of production and way of life is no longer viable, pastoralism continues, although in many new forms [24].…”
Section: Bibliographymentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Though framed as indigenous‐led CBFiM projects, abatement schemes demand top‐down institutional regulations and accounting methodologies, prioritizing emissions objectives over local empowerment. The implicit assumption that pastoral societies employ homogenous burning practices worldwide overlooks the diverse reasons socio‐culturally distinct IPLCs use fire and influence local fire regimes, reducing these groups to a singular identity and discounting the need for project developers to carry out nuanced inquiries in local contexts (see Supporting Information S1, Table S4) (Catley et al., 2013; Muller et al., 2019; UNU‐IAS, 2015).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whether national or regional policy frameworks governing international migration or the regional policy frameworks defining pastoral policy, such as emerging in Africa from the African Union, IGAD or ECOWAS 1 (Davies et al, 2018), there is a clear need for a more flexible, plural, decentred approach, premised on a multi-level governance framework that can encompass decentralised local knowledges and practices (Triandafyllidou, 2020), requiring policy to see the world like migrants or pastoralists (Catley et al, 2013). This means a rethinking of 'global compacts' premised on regularised stability and order, challenging current framings so asto allow for the enhancement of reliability practices and professionals, putting uncertainty at the centre.…”
Section: Implications For Global Governance Framework and Policymentioning
confidence: 99%