Pastoral Land Rights and Environmental Resource Governance and Sustainability along Ethiopia–Kenya border

Abstract

Past studies mainly focused on the effects of the lack of a pastoral land tenure security system. There is scarcity of evidence regarding the effects of pastoral land tenure insecurity in the context of cross-border environmental resource governance and sustainability that the present study attempted to contribute. The main objective of this study is therefore to assess how far the state land tenure system has impacted environmental resource governance and sustainability along the Ethiopia–Kenya border. The study employed a qualitative method in which key informant interviews, in-depth interviews, and focus group discussions were utilized as the primary data collection methods; moreover, the legal documents of the two states, journal articles, official reports of governmental, and nongovernmental organizations report and other relevant secondary sources were assessed in the review of the literature. Data were collected from various respondents from the pastoralists, nongovernmental organizations, and government bodies from local, national, regional, and international organization representatives. The findings of the study showed that in both states, the government laws and policies adopted have not taken into account the pastoral way of life. In addition, the lack of tenure security for the pastoralists has endangered cross-border environmental resource governance and sustainability. The pastoral landholding system is communally influenced mainly by states’ interests and human encroachments. It is vital that pastoral policies should accommodate pastoral felt needs and interests in which the voices of pastoralists are heard in the policy-making process; hence, there should be a special representation for the pastoral people in the regional and federal legislature (in Ethiopia) and central government parliament (in Kenya), and there should be a cross-border pastoralists forum to ensure better environmental resource governance in the borderland.

Effect of lime on soil chemical properties and corn growth in Ultisols Lebak, Banten

“…Alemu et al [6] reported that the highest barley yield (2.2 t ha -1 ) in Ethiopia was achieved by 1.65 t ha -1 of liming and 30 kg ha -1 of P fertilizer. Applying 4.47 t ha -1 of lime to acidic soil in Ethiopia significantly reduced exchangeable acidity (Al 3+ and H + ) from 1.90 to 0.92 cmolc kg -1 at first season, increased available P from 1.48 mg kg -1 to 2.38 mg kg -1 , increased exchangeable calcium (Ca) from 4.50 to 6.65 cmolc kg -1 , and increased the cation exchange capacity (CEC) of the soil from 17.56 to 20.66 cmolc kg -1 [16]. Liming had a significant effect on the weight of 1,000 corn kernels, available P, Mg 2+ , increasing soil pH, reducing exchangeable Al 3+ , and soil acidity in acidic soil in Kebele [17].…”