2015
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stv1080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

pastis: Bayesian extrasolar planet validation – II. Constraining exoplanet blend scenarios using spectroscopic diagnoses

Abstract: The statistical validation of transiting exoplanets proved to be an efficient technique to secure the nature of small exoplanet signals which cannot be established by purely spectroscopic means. However, the spectroscopic diagnoses are providing us with useful constraints on the presence of blended stellar contaminants. In this paper, we present how a contaminating star affects the measurements of the various spectroscopic diagnoses as function of the parameters of the target and contaminating stars using the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
114
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
7
114
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The errors on the RV are estimated using the method explained in Bouchy et al (2001) and in Appendix A of Boisse et al (2010). For the bisector and FWHM, we used the photon noise factors listed in Santerne et al (2015). These spectroscopic diagnostics are used to reveal the presence of contaminating stars, therefore likely false positives that might be the source of the transit event (Santos et al 2002;Torres et al 2005).…”
Section: Sophie Observations and Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The errors on the RV are estimated using the method explained in Bouchy et al (2001) and in Appendix A of Boisse et al (2010). For the bisector and FWHM, we used the photon noise factors listed in Santerne et al (2015). These spectroscopic diagnostics are used to reveal the presence of contaminating stars, therefore likely false positives that might be the source of the transit event (Santos et al 2002;Torres et al 2005).…”
Section: Sophie Observations and Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, if the eclipsing system is physically bound with the target star, they are most likely blended in both photometry and spectroscopy. Using the variation in the line profile (the bisector and the FWHM, see Santerne et al 2015), we identified some triple systems with relatively faint companions compared with the target star. However, if the eclipse host contributes to less than about 5% of the total flux of the system (magnitude difference more than 3, or mass ratio lower than ∼0.5), we would not be able to detect the second set of lines in the cross-correlation functions or its impact on the target line-profile shape.…”
Section: Eclipsing Binaries and Contaminating Eclipsing Binariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These values are useful to diagnose radial-velocity variations that are intrinsic to the star, for instance caused by stellar activity on its different timescales (e.g. Queloz et al 2000;Santos et al 2010;Figueira et al 2010;Dumusque et al 2012;Santerne et al 2015). Values for the chromospheric activity index log R HK were also derived (see Sect.…”
Section: Observations and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We therefore have no evidence that stellar activity may be contributing to produce the observed signals or any other additional signal in the data, at any timescale. The lack of any long-term significant variability on the BIS and FWHM also excludes the possibility that HD 219828 c is a solar-like stellar companion in a highly inclined orbit (Santerne et al 2015), since such a companion is expected to leave a trace on these parameters.…”
Section: Radial-velocity Fittingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This value also agrees with the identification of a second component in the spectra by Kolbl et al (2015) with an estimated T eff of 3500 ± 250 K and contributing to 1.06% of the total flux. More recently, Santerne et al (2015) performed blend models with PASTIS (Díaz et al 2014) and derived a companion mass of 0.35 ± 0.03 M .…”
Section: Search For a Second Component In The Ccfmentioning
confidence: 99%