2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.11.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pasting investigation, SEM observation and the possible interaction study on rice starch–pullulan combination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Particularly, the rice starch profile showed pronounced peak and TV which located around 3,600 mPa s and 2,800 mPa s, respectively. Similar results were obtained by Chen et al (2015) for rice starch with amylose content of about 23.3%.…”
Section: Pasting Propertiessupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Particularly, the rice starch profile showed pronounced peak and TV which located around 3,600 mPa s and 2,800 mPa s, respectively. Similar results were obtained by Chen et al (2015) for rice starch with amylose content of about 23.3%.…”
Section: Pasting Propertiessupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Similar results were obtained by Chen et al . () for rice starch with amylose content of about 23.3%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar results were observed in samples prepared from MA and LA (data not shown). Recently, the interaction of rice starch and pullulan (non‐ionic polysaccharide) was elucidated by Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) which suggested that high Mw pullulan could act as a thin membrane to wrap starch granules . Similarly, xanthan gum, a polysaccharide with high molecular weight (3.470 kDa,) might not be able to impregnate inside rice starch granules and then was adsorbed mostly on the granule surface.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Starch samples were placed on a specimen stage with double‐sided tape. After coating with gold palladium using a sputter coater, the apparent morphology of starch samples was observed …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%