2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2018.06.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Past-present discontinuity in ecological change and marine governance: An integrated narrative approach to artisanal fishing

Abstract: Today artisanal fishers working in Natura 2000 coastal protected sites face two major types of change: in marine resources, and the governance of their professions. Such transformations affect fishers' livelihoods, identities and traditions, yet little is known about how these professionals elaborate on these changesi.e., as continuities or discontinuities-in the narratives they produce as a group. Interviews and focus-groups with artisanal fishers and shellfish harvesters (n=36) from the Portuguese Southwest … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, coping potential did not seem to be supported by management authorities, as social trust was relatively low, lower than previously reported in relation to conflicts around terrestrial wildlife (Johansson et al 2012(Johansson et al , 2019a. Low social trust might be an expression of power asymmetries between fishers and governing institutions (Mouro, Santos, and Castro 2018). Conservation and management of marine wildlife must allow for solutions that could be adapted to place-specific solutions requiring local involvement, experience, and knowledge (IPBES 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Unfortunately, coping potential did not seem to be supported by management authorities, as social trust was relatively low, lower than previously reported in relation to conflicts around terrestrial wildlife (Johansson et al 2012(Johansson et al , 2019a. Low social trust might be an expression of power asymmetries between fishers and governing institutions (Mouro, Santos, and Castro 2018). Conservation and management of marine wildlife must allow for solutions that could be adapted to place-specific solutions requiring local involvement, experience, and knowledge (IPBES 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…All over the world, coastal communities and traditional small-scale fisheries are experiencing an impact on recovering populations of marine mammals. This entails a conflict with prevailing conservation interests that frame population increases as successful management (Davis et al 2020;De Mar ıa, Barboza, and Szteren 2014;Mouro, Santos, and Castro 2018). Terrestrial wildlife species threatened by or threatening humans, and their activities, have received considerable attention (Dickman 2010), but the marine context of human-wildlife interaction is a relatively new field of study (Guerra 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Drawing from these positions, I will now propose a dynamic model of local knowledge that argues that this overlap is indeed imperfect. I will illustrate two dimensions of this proposal -(1) knowledge as intertwining process and product, and (2) knowledge as learning and hybridisation through relationwith examples from farmers and fishers in studies conducted in Natura 2000 sites in Portugal (see methodological details in Castro and Santos, 2020;Mouro et al, 2018;Castro and Mouro, 2016). Together, the conceptual proposal and the examples will help to clarify the relevance of local knowledge and epistemic bonds for people-place relations, illustrating how, when mobilised to interpret Natura laws, these bonds are consequential for both resisting and integrating them.…”
Section: The Division Of Epistemic Labourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Natura sites, new legislation decides what activities professional groups – for example, fishers, farmers – are (and are not) permitted for the sake of species and habitats (Blicharska et al, 2016). Such professional groups have contested many of these legal innovations, getting involved in ‘battles of ideas’ criticizing, for instance, disregard of their local knowledge and of how it can be vital for the development of joint strategies for resource protection (Beunen et al, 2013; Blicharska et al, 2016; Jentoft, 2000; Martin et al, 2016; Mouro et al, 2018). Yet very few psycho-social analyses have so far explored these conflicts from their perspective (Castro, 2012), with most being principally attentive to the general public, or to non-professional groups (e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%