Fears about satanic ritual child abuse swept the nation in the 1 980s and 1 990s, but were probably largely unfounded. In this article, we explore sociocultural, individ ual, and therapy-related factors that together may be responsible for the creation of ritual abuse allegations. We conclude that there are serious problems with embracing false ritual abuse claims and call for more responsible journalistic coverage of issues relating to child abuse, more research to identify factors that contribute to false allegations, and better therapeutic practices to aid people seeking psychological help.In the mid-1980s a new form of child abuse allegation surfaced in the United States, and eventually, worldwide. At first called satanic abuse, then satanic ritualistic abuse, and then simply ritual abuse, this form of child abuse was said by clinicians and a few researchers to be especially damaging to its victims because of its extraordinarily violent and bizarre nature (e.g., Kelley, 1989Kelley, , 1996Young, Sachs, Braun, & Watkins, 1991). Ritual abuse was said to involve large numbers of victims and perpetra tors of both genders, to be so cloaked in secrecy and involve such precise concealment of evidence that almost no one knew about it, and to involve the most horribly painful and degrading practices imaginable includ ing sacrificing human infants to satan, gang-raping young children during satanic worship, eating human flesh and feces, and forcing