2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jalgor.2009.02.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Past–future separation and normal forms in temporal predicate logic specifications

Abstract: Temporal specifications are often used when phenomena are modelled where dynamics play a main role. If simulation is one of the aims of modelling, usually a restricted, executable modelling language format is used, based on some form of past to future implications. In this paper a detailed transformation procedure is described that takes any temporal predicate logic specification and generates a specification in a past implies future normal format. The procedure works for temporal specifications in which the a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is a use of Predicate Logic for which numbers can be used and for which constants, terms and variables can be used for time points t, state properties p, and traces tr. For somewhat similar or comparable uses of Predicate Logic see (Bosse et al 2009;Bosse and Treur 2011;Sharpanskykh and Treur 2010;Treur 2009) or (Treur 2016), Chap. 13.…”
Section: Formalisation Of Temporal Factorisation and Criterial Causat...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a use of Predicate Logic for which numbers can be used and for which constants, terms and variables can be used for time points t, state properties p, and traces tr. For somewhat similar or comparable uses of Predicate Logic see (Bosse et al 2009;Bosse and Treur 2011;Sharpanskykh and Treur 2010;Treur 2009) or (Treur 2016), Chap. 13.…”
Section: Formalisation Of Temporal Factorisation and Criterial Causat...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the quantifiers are distributed over and within these implications. Now consider the detailed description of these steps (for a more profound description of the procedure see [37]). …”
Section: ∃T2 ≤ T and Holds(state(γt2 Input(a2)) Communicated F Rom Tmentioning
confidence: 99%