2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2012.11.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Past and Present Scenario of Open Access Movement in India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The status of OA journals was also investigated in various research fields, such as library and information science (Mukherjee, 2009;Yuan and Hua, 2011;Xia, 2012;Chen et al, 2016), computer science (Lawrence, 2001), psychology (Shin, 2003), pharmacy (Murali et al, 2004), physics (Harnad and Brody, 2004), medicine (Sahu et al, 2005), communication (Zhang, 2006), biology (Frandsen, 2009) and business and management (Lyons and Booth, 2011). Moreover, a considerable number of studies examined the status of OA journals and publishing in specific countries and world regions, like Zimbabwe (Nyambi and Maynard, 2012), South Korea (Shin, 2012), China (Hu et al, 2012), India (Sawant, 2013), the Netherlands (Woutersen-Windhouwer, 2013), Argentina (Miguel et al, 2013) and D8 countries (Ghane and Niazmand, 2016).…”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The status of OA journals was also investigated in various research fields, such as library and information science (Mukherjee, 2009;Yuan and Hua, 2011;Xia, 2012;Chen et al, 2016), computer science (Lawrence, 2001), psychology (Shin, 2003), pharmacy (Murali et al, 2004), physics (Harnad and Brody, 2004), medicine (Sahu et al, 2005), communication (Zhang, 2006), biology (Frandsen, 2009) and business and management (Lyons and Booth, 2011). Moreover, a considerable number of studies examined the status of OA journals and publishing in specific countries and world regions, like Zimbabwe (Nyambi and Maynard, 2012), South Korea (Shin, 2012), China (Hu et al, 2012), India (Sawant, 2013), the Netherlands (Woutersen-Windhouwer, 2013), Argentina (Miguel et al, 2013) and D8 countries (Ghane and Niazmand, 2016).…”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Countries occurring in the VOSviewer analysis include Australia, China, Germany and India as well as the USA and it is apparent that approaches to OA policy and take-up have varied across these and other countries. The OA literature includes a large number of country-specific studies, including those from China (Cheng et al, 2012;Hu et al, 2013;Shao et al, 2013;Zhao and Wu, 2014) and India (Balaji Babu et al, 2012;Gutam et al, 2010;Mukherjee, 2014;Sahu and Arya, 2013;Sawant, 2011Sawant, , 2012Sawant, , 2013 providing studies of research attitudes and overviews of service implementations. It is interesting that these BRIC countries are particularly covered in the literature on OA since they are making an increasingly important contribution to academic research and communication in general (Elsevier, 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Around 23 publishers produce 535 journals to support open access in India. 58 The DOAJ reports a regular yearly increase of 46 OA journals in India, and this trend will likely continue. The reasons for this rise may include the emphasis of various national donor agencies and governing bodies of the major research councils on the dissemination of publicly funded research through self-archiving and OA journals.…”
Section: Lis Professionals and Library Associations In Pakistan Have Done Little To Create Awareness And Promote The Open Access Movementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…48 Many efforts have been made across India to create awareness of the advantages of OA throughout society. 49 Librarians and other LIS professionals in India have also realized the value of scholarly open access and actively engage in developing institutional repositories. 50 The National Knowledge Commission of India has formulated policies that would improve access to research through its open and wider dissemination.…”
Section: There Is An Urgent Need To Concentrate On the Development Of Institutional And Subject Repositories At A National Level In Pakmentioning
confidence: 99%