2021
DOI: 10.1007/s12517-021-07984-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Past and future prediction of land cover land use change based on earth observation data by the CA–Markov model: a case study from Duhok governorate, Iraq

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It also fails to objectively reflect stochastic evolution and future development trends in land-use change [62]. The Markov model conducts superior simulation over long time periods but is unable to simulate spatial pattern change and needs to be combined with a spatial prediction model [63]. The CLUE-S model has a strong spatial allocation function but is limited in land quantity prediction [36].…”
Section: Discussion Of the Rf-markov-flus Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also fails to objectively reflect stochastic evolution and future development trends in land-use change [62]. The Markov model conducts superior simulation over long time periods but is unable to simulate spatial pattern change and needs to be combined with a spatial prediction model [63]. The CLUE-S model has a strong spatial allocation function but is limited in land quantity prediction [36].…”
Section: Discussion Of the Rf-markov-flus Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Machine learning, especially hybrid machine learning models, has become a new technique in the field of land use change prediction. Abijith [30], Khwarahm [31], Fitawok [32], Nasiri [33], Nath [34], and Al-sharif [35] evaluated the uncertainty of cellular automata-Markov chain approach modeling, and they predicted and analyzed land use change in the northern coastal region of Tamil Nadu in India, Bahir Dar City in Ethiopia, Arasbaran region in Iran, and Tripoli Metropolitan City in Lebanon, depending on the approach. ZiaeeVafaeyan [36], Gounaridis [37], Levy [38], and Abdullahi [39] conducted a multi-scenario analysis of land use change by leveraging the cellular automata-random forest model, bee colony optimization, random forest-cellular automata modeling, and Bayes theory.…”
Section: Literature Review 21 Research Methods and Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through that period, the bare land displayed a constant reduction of about 11.9% of the entire area, while the built-up lands extent raised from 240 to 1118 km 2 , Table 4. The growth of the urban area denotes the growth of the population and expansion of organization (Khwarahm et al 2021a). Population development is considered one of the key factors that cause LU/LC alterations (Wang and Zheng 2022).…”
Section: Assessment Of the Classi Cationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, there was an important degree of tting between the simulated and real images, Table 5. The total Kappa numerical differences of K no = 0.8635, K location = 0.8541, K location Strata = 0.8541, K standard = 0.7853 were accomplished, which are measured suitable to the extent that the model justi cation consistency is concerned for additional use (Khwarahm at al 2021a). The model is implemented reasonably in expecting the water bodies, bare land, urban areas, cultivated lands, and forest lands, Table 4.…”
Section: Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%