The Handbook of Hispanic Linguistics 2012
DOI: 10.1002/9781118228098.ch23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Passives andseConstructions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, as noted by an anonymous JL referee, the low degree of variation in our results might also be due to the limited number of analyzed verbs. Basically the same holds for the results on the Spanish anticausative (see Mendikoetxea 1999, 2012; Kailuweit 2012).…”
supporting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further, as noted by an anonymous JL referee, the low degree of variation in our results might also be due to the limited number of analyzed verbs. Basically the same holds for the results on the Spanish anticausative (see Mendikoetxea 1999, 2012; Kailuweit 2012).…”
supporting
confidence: 66%
“…20Similarly, Mendikoetxea (1999: 1602; 2012) argues that Spanish alternating verbs which encode the anticausative with the unmarked variant are internally caused (see also Rodríguez Ramalle 2005: 245). Schäfer (2008: 161–162) presents a scale in which spontaneity is related to the encoding variants of the anticausative alternant in German, Greek and Italian.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This section is mainly for background purposes and is not intended to be an exhaustive list of properties of each construction; it serves as a way to differentiate them, because on the surface, they can appear in many instances to be formally identical. (See Mendikoetxea , and Sánchez López for more properties. )…”
Section: Background Diagnosticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other elements can give rise to one or the other interpretation. See, for instance, Suñer and Mendikoetxea . What is important for the present discussion is the interpretation itself, not what elements give rise to it.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…There is a huge body of work about anticausative structures, the relations between the causative and the anticausative version and the correct notion of 'causation' that should be involved in such cases (see, just to name a few, Jespersen 1927, Nedjalkov 1969, Fillmore 1970, Smith 1970, Chierchia 1989, Labelle 1992, Haspelmath 1993, Levin 1993, Levin & Rappaport-Hovav 1995, Reinhart 2000, Doron 2003, Alexiadou & Anagnostopoulou 2004, Dobrovie-Sorin 2006, Schäfer 2008, Koontz-Garboden 2009, Labelle & Doron 2010, Rappaport-Hovav & Levin 2010, Lundquist 2011, Mendikoetxea 2012, Vivanco 2015, to name just a few examples).…”
Section: Inchoative the Table Se Movedmentioning
confidence: 99%