Passive portfolio management over a finite horizon with a target liquidation value under transaction costs and solvency constraints

Abstract

We consider a passive investor who divides his capital between two assets: a risk-free money market instrument and an index fund, or ETF, tracking a broad market index. We model the evolution of the market index by a lognormal diffusion. The agent faces both fixed and proportional transaction costs and solvency constraints. The objective is to maximize the expected utility from the portfolio liquidation at a fixed horizon but if the portfolio reaches a pre-set target value then the position in the risky asset is liquidated. The model is formulated as a parabolic impulse control problem and we characterize the value function as the unique constrained viscosity solution of the associated quasi-variational inequality. We show the existence of an impulse policy which is arbitrarily close to the optimal one by reducing the model to a sequence of iterated optimal stopping problems. The value function and the quasi-optimal policy are computed numerically by an iterative finite element discretization technique. We present extended numerical results in the case of a CRRA utility function, showing the non-stationary shape of the optimal strategy and how it varies with respect to the model parameters. The numerical experiments reveal that, even with small transaction costs and distant horizons, the optimal strategy is essentially a buy-and-hold trading strategy where the agent recalibrates his portfolio very few times.

An optimal switching approach toward cost‐effective control of a stand‐alone photovoltaic panel system under stochastic environment

“…Because of their nonlinearity and the degeneration of coefficients, HJB equations do not always have smooth solutions that are defined in a classical sense, while they admit solutions with lower regularity called viscosity solutions . Due to their rich mathematical properties, HJB equations and viscosity solutions have been analyzed from both analytical and numerical viewpoints . To our knowledge, PV systems have not been mathematically analyzed from the viewpoint of stochastic control and viscosity solutions, although they are potential mathematical tools for efficiently analyzing the systems.…”

HJB and Fokker-Planck equations for river environmental management based on stochastic impulse control with discrete and random observation

“…Therefore, the problem can be formulated as a stochastic impulse control problem [34][35]. There exist many stochastic impulse control models ranging from the exactly solvable [36], semi-analytical [37], and more complex models [38]. Most of them are based on the complete information assumption that the decision-maker who controls the system can continuously receive the complete information of its dynamics.…”

A Threshold Type Policy for Trading a Mean-Reverting Asset with Fixed Transaction Costs

“…They demonstrated how to best adjust the portfolio so as to maximize an terminal utility function. Further studies along this line can be found in (Baccarin and Marazzina 2016) in which they considered a related problem with solvency constraints. They were able to establish the existence of an impulse policy and provided a numerical method.…”