To preserve postoperative language, electrical stimulation mapping is
often conducted prior to surgery involving the language dominant hemisphere.
Object naming is the task most widely used to identify language cortex, and
sites where stimulation elicits naming difficulty are typically spared from
resection. In clinical practice, sites classified as positive undergo no further
testing regarding the underlying cause of naming failure. Word production is a
complex function involving multiple mechanisms that culminate in the
identification of the target word. Two main mechanisms, i.e., semantic and
phonological, underlie the retrieval of stored information regarding word
meaning and word sounds, and naming can be hampered by disrupting either of
these. These two mechanisms are likely mediated by different brain areas, and
therefore, stimulation-identified naming sites might not be functionally
equivalent. We investigated whether further testing at stimulation-identified
naming sites would reveal an anatomical dissociation between these two
mechanisms. In 16 refractory temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) patients with
implanted subdural electrodes, we tested whether, despite inability to produce
an item name, patients could reliably access semantic or phonological
information regarding objects during cortical stimulation. We found that
stimulation at naming sites in superior temporal cortex tended to impair
phonological processing, yet spared access to semantic information. By contrast,
stimulation of inferior temporal naming sites revealed a greater proportion of
sites where semantic access was impaired, and a dissociation between sites where
stimulation spared or disrupted semantic or phonological processing. These
functional-anatomical dissociations reveal the more specific contribution to
naming provided by these cortical areas and shed light on the often profound,
interictal word-finding deficit observed in temporal lobe epilepsy.
Additionally, these techniques potentially lay the groundwork for future studies
to determine whether particular naming sites that fall within the margins of the
desired clinical resection might be resected without significant risk of
decline.