2006 IEEE Aerospace Conference
DOI: 10.1109/aero.2006.1655794
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Passive Imaging Based Multicue Hazard Detection for Spacecraft Safe Landing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
1

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This technique infers the size and centroid of rocks by identifying their shadows in the image. 13 The method first gammacorrects the image in order to increase contrast. The image is then segmented into regions of shadow and light; individual shadow contours are then constructed from the edges of the shadowed regions, with some noise rejection before creating discrete hazard objects.…”
Section: A Image Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique infers the size and centroid of rocks by identifying their shadows in the image. 13 The method first gammacorrects the image in order to increase contrast. The image is then segmented into regions of shadow and light; individual shadow contours are then constructed from the edges of the shadowed regions, with some noise rejection before creating discrete hazard objects.…”
Section: A Image Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome the limitations of active sensing many approaches have been developed for the estimation of 3D surface geometry and landing site assessment from passive camera sensors [16,24,38,49]. Camera sensors are inexpensive, low power, lightweight devices that can operate from a large range of flight altitudes and can be safely used in populated areas, making them an attractive alternative to expensive, power intensive active Fig.…”
Section: Unprepared Landing Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whether a passive-only or combined sensing solution is used the ability to quickly assess candidate landing sites is a crucial step employed by many approaches in the literature [5, 13,22,24,37]. Monocular texture analysis techniques have played a predominant role in finding suitable candidate landing sites as they typically involve a fairly simple image processing and are easily amenable to real-time operation [9, 13,16,22,37].…”
Section: Unprepared Landing Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It happens frequently that the terrain conditions of these area are more complicated, this not only poses a great challenge to the spacecraft Guidance, Navigation, & Control Systems, but also requests more higher demand to the performance of landing obstacle detection and the efficiency of the landing site selection. Up to now, using multiple sensors data for hazard detection have been proposed (Brady et al, 2009;Neveu et al, 2015), including passive optical image data (Bajracharya, 2002;Cheng et al, 2001;Cohanim et al, 2013;Huertas et al, 2006;Mahmood and Saaj, 2015;Matthies et al, 2008;Woicke and Mooij, 2016;Yan et al, 2013), LiDAR data (Amzajerdian et al, 2013;Chakroborty et al, 2009;de Lafontaine et al, 2006;Johnson et al, 2002) and Radar data (Pollard et al, 2003), and so forth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%