2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.12.087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Passive dosing: An approach to control mutagen exposure in the Ames fluctuation test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus when passively dosing HOCs with log K Silicone/Free values of around 1,000 and above, V Water / V Silicone phase ratios less than around 10-20 are typically used [ 9 , 23 -26 ]. For example, Bougeard et al [ 26 ] and Smith et al…”
Section: Step 1: Selection Of a Passive Dosing Phasementioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus when passively dosing HOCs with log K Silicone/Free values of around 1,000 and above, V Water / V Silicone phase ratios less than around 10-20 are typically used [ 9 , 23 -26 ]. For example, Bougeard et al [ 26 ] and Smith et al…”
Section: Step 1: Selection Of a Passive Dosing Phasementioning
confidence: 97%
“…For example, a passive dosing format based on silicone O-rings was applied in the Ames II assay for determining the mutagenicity of amino-and nitro-PAHs in the absence of metabolic activation [ 26 ]. The C Free -based effect concentrations when passive dosing were 3-33 times lower than those based on the nominal spiked concentrations, with the differences increasing for the more hydrophobic compounds due to their enhanced sorption and thus lower availability.…”
Section: Control Of Hydrophobic Compound Exposurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The freely dissolved concentration in the aqueous medium determines the internal concentration at the biological receptor. Nominal concentrations are no reliable measure for exposure and can be orders of magnitude greater than freely dissolved concentrations, depending on the test system and compound absorption properties (Bougeard, Gallampois, & Brack, 2011). This is due to the fact that lipophilic chemicals adsorb to the walls of test vessels, medium components, test organisms, and cells or subcellular compartments, resulting in depletion below the nominal concentration (Escher & Hermens, 2004).…”
Section: Effect Concentrations Of Chemosensitisers In Different Test mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date passive dosing has been used in different in vitro tests, leading to increases in apparent assay sensitivity compared with solvent spiking due to the rigorously defined and stable exposure concentrations [23,26]. Passive dosing has also recently been applied in the Ames II assay for measuring the mutagenicity of amino-and nitro-PAHs in the absence of metabolic activation [25]. Here, effect concentrations based on passive dosing partitioning were 3-33 times lower than those based on nominally spiked concentrations, the discrepancy increasing with higher hydrophobicity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Passive dosing is one approach to achieve defined and constant dissolved concentrations during in vitro assays [23][24][25][26]. Here, a biologically inert polymer, such as silicone, is loaded with hydrophobic test compound and introduced into the medium where it functions as a partitioning source and compensates for losses and sorption during the test [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%