“…In this respect, 2 major strategies may be considered: (1) strengthening, ie, increasing the capacity of the structural members and/or (2) reducing the seismic demand, eg, with the installation of seismic protective devices, such as dampers and isolators (see, for instance, previous studies [2][3][4][5][6][7][8] ). In certain cases, the former strategy could be more convenient for relatively small-sized buildings, whereas the latter tends to be more advantageous for large structures, including key infrastructural facilities (eg, schools, university buildings, and hospitals), so to keep to a minimum any service interruption (although seismic dampers can be effective and cost-efficient also for retrofitting low-rise buildings, see, eg, Benavent-Climent et al 9 ).…”