2017 2nd International Conference on Power and Renewable Energy (ICPRE) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/icpre.2017.8390599
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Passive congregation based particle swam optimization (pso) with self-organizing hierarchical approach for non-convex economic dispatch

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast with other nonconvex optimization techniques, the PSO has several appealing advantages (Al Bahrani and Patra, 2017; Al-Bahrani and Patra, 2018; Ding et al, 2019; Mirjalili et al, 2020): (1) the relatively independent calculation mode of particles in PSO has natural advantages when combined with parallel computing and asynchronous update, contributing to the improvement of computational efficiency; (2) the PSO only has a few parameters and requires less hyperparameter tuning; (3) the PSO can easily handle the inequality constraints; (4) the PSO has a few or no restrictions on the form of the objective function; (5) the PSO has a simple concept and is easy to implement. However, the PSO also bears several drawbacks on solving the ED problem (Chaturvedi et al, 2017; Chopra et al, 2020; Panda and Padhy, 2008). First, the PSO often fails to strike a favorable balance between exploration and exploitation, resulting in the premature convergence problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast with other nonconvex optimization techniques, the PSO has several appealing advantages (Al Bahrani and Patra, 2017; Al-Bahrani and Patra, 2018; Ding et al, 2019; Mirjalili et al, 2020): (1) the relatively independent calculation mode of particles in PSO has natural advantages when combined with parallel computing and asynchronous update, contributing to the improvement of computational efficiency; (2) the PSO only has a few parameters and requires less hyperparameter tuning; (3) the PSO can easily handle the inequality constraints; (4) the PSO has a few or no restrictions on the form of the objective function; (5) the PSO has a simple concept and is easy to implement. However, the PSO also bears several drawbacks on solving the ED problem (Chaturvedi et al, 2017; Chopra et al, 2020; Panda and Padhy, 2008). First, the PSO often fails to strike a favorable balance between exploration and exploitation, resulting in the premature convergence problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%