2015
DOI: 10.1002/2015jc010840
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Passive buoyant tracers in the ocean surface boundary layer: 2. Observations and simulations of microplastic marine debris

Abstract: This paper is the second of a two‐part series that investigates passive buoyant tracers in the ocean surface boundary layer (OSBL). The first part examines the influence of equilibrium wind‐waves on vertical tracer distributions, based on large eddy simulations (LESs) of the wave‐averaged Navier‐Stokes equation. Motivated by observations of buoyant microplastic marine debris (MPMD), this study applies the LES model and the parametric one‐dimensional column model from part one to examine the vertical distributi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
55
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(74 reference statements)
4
55
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Adjusting each observation forward in time to a common sampling year of 2014 and to no-wind sampling conditions increased the observed plastic concentrations in nearly all samples ( figure S2). Previous studies have taken vertical wind-mixing of buoyant plastic debris into account by employing a simple one-dimensional model (Kukulka et al 2012) whose dynamics capture only a fraction of deep mixing observed (Brunner et al 2015). Certainly the variation in data collection (e.g., net mesh size); sample analysis (e.g., visual versus microscope identification); count-to-mass conversions (which are strongly dependent on particle size); and model design (e.g., source functions and removal processes) also contribute to the discrepancies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adjusting each observation forward in time to a common sampling year of 2014 and to no-wind sampling conditions increased the observed plastic concentrations in nearly all samples ( figure S2). Previous studies have taken vertical wind-mixing of buoyant plastic debris into account by employing a simple one-dimensional model (Kukulka et al 2012) whose dynamics capture only a fraction of deep mixing observed (Brunner et al 2015). Certainly the variation in data collection (e.g., net mesh size); sample analysis (e.g., visual versus microscope identification); count-to-mass conversions (which are strongly dependent on particle size); and model design (e.g., source functions and removal processes) also contribute to the discrepancies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is unclear how plastics relate to the drifters. Depending on their rising velocity, and wind and wave conditions (Brunner et al, ; Kukulka & Brunner, ; Kukulka et al, ), plastics drift both on the sea surface and submerged in the upper ocean (Kooi et al, ; Reisser et al, ). As a result, both types of drifters are possible valid proxies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kukulka et al () showed that large‐scale velocity structures observed in shallow water via acoustic Doppler profiler were also reproduced by LES. Brunner et al () compared profiles of microplastic debris with observations presented by Law et al (). Chen et al () compared horizontal diffusivities obtained from LES with observations from several studies (Lawrence et al, ; Murthy, ; Okubo, ), as shown later in Figure .…”
Section: Applications Of Les To Oml Turbulence Without Materials Transmentioning
confidence: 99%