2020
DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2020.00125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Passive Brain-Computer Interfaces for Enhanced Human-Robot Interaction

Abstract: Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) have long been seen as control interfaces that translate changes in brain activity, produced either by means of a volitional modulation or in response to an external stimulation. However, recent trends in the BCI and neurofeedback research highlight passive monitoring of a user's brain activity in order to estimate cognitive load, attention level, perceived errors and emotions. Extraction of such higher order information from brain signals is seen as a gateway for facilitation … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 133 publications
(176 reference statements)
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In relation with the previous work, this research does not deviate from the facts that are listed in [60], which considers the EEG technology as a solution for training the users, enhancing the interaction with the robots and providing better assessment of the users. In fact, this research provides deeper insights on the challenges and the advantages of emotion-based application for controlling the robots as it increases the trustworthy between human and robots.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In relation with the previous work, this research does not deviate from the facts that are listed in [60], which considers the EEG technology as a solution for training the users, enhancing the interaction with the robots and providing better assessment of the users. In fact, this research provides deeper insights on the challenges and the advantages of emotion-based application for controlling the robots as it increases the trustworthy between human and robots.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…As a reflection of the importance that is earning emotion recognition for HRI, more emotion-driven applications have been developed. Some of the most relevant examples that can be found nowadays are: [60] presents a deep analysis in the future potential of using EEG analysis for enhancing humanrobot interactions. In the presented paper, the authors list the advantages of such an approach: providing a socially engaging training for the users, decreasing the time for calibration and configuration of the robots, and providing systematically viable solution for users' performance assessment while working with robots.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kim et al ( 2017 ), for instance, use error-related potentials from EEG signals, for implicit feedback, to improve gesture-based robot control during human robot interactions. A recent review provides details as to how brain computer interfaces and neurofeedback research is now being used to estimate cognitive load, attentional level, perceived errors and emotions from brain signals to improve interactions between humans and robots (Alimardani and Hiraki, 2020 ). Zeng et al ( 2020 ) propose a brain inspired model of belief ToM using high-level knowledge of the functions of different brain regions relevant for ToM and test it on two simple false belief tasks.…”
Section: Cognitive Vs Computational Tom: a Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…electroencephalography). 42 In the future, we will take into consideration one or some PwD’s cognitive and affective states as additional dimension(s) of state space, by integrating sensing technologies in a cost-effective way (e.g. in terms of computational complexity).…”
Section: Limitation and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%