1977
DOI: 10.1007/bf00426570
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Passive avoidance learning in the rat as functions of d-amphetamine dosage and shock intensity

Abstract: The effects of d-amphetamine dosage (0, 1, 3, and 5 mg/kg) and shock intensity (0.2, 0.5, and 0.8 ma) on the learning of a passive avoidance response were assessed in rats. A curvilinear dose-response relationship was found at all shock levels, showing slower learning under moderate doses of d-amphetamine. The lowest shock level produced slower learning, especially in conjunction with the lowest dose of d-amphetamine. Results are discussed in terms of freezing behavior.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also notable that d-amphetamine, a potent DA releaser and psychomotor stimulant did not cause an impairment of the PA retention. This is consistent with most studies indicating that d-amphetamine either does not alter or rather enhances PA retention (Banfi et al 1982;Kovacs and de Wied 1978;Seliger 1975;Seliger 1977). Remoxipride (3-10 mol/kg) produced a decrease in general motor activity and a profound increase in training latencies without any effect on PA retention; whereas, raclopride affected neither PA training nor retention performance.…”
Section: Role Of Da In the Inhibitory Actions Of Pca In Pasupporting
confidence: 90%
“…It is also notable that d-amphetamine, a potent DA releaser and psychomotor stimulant did not cause an impairment of the PA retention. This is consistent with most studies indicating that d-amphetamine either does not alter or rather enhances PA retention (Banfi et al 1982;Kovacs and de Wied 1978;Seliger 1975;Seliger 1977). Remoxipride (3-10 mol/kg) produced a decrease in general motor activity and a profound increase in training latencies without any effect on PA retention; whereas, raclopride affected neither PA training nor retention performance.…”
Section: Role Of Da In the Inhibitory Actions Of Pca In Pasupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The latency to enter the dark compartment was recorded and defined as the ‘approach latency’. After the door was closed, an inescapable foot shock (0.56 mA for 1 s; Seliger, 1977; Gschanes et al. , 1998) was delivered through metal rods of the floor.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latency to enter the dark compartment was recorded and defined as the 'approach latency'. After the door was closed, an inescapable foot shock (0.56 mA for 1 s; Seliger, 1977;Gschanes et al, 1998) was delivered through metal rods of the floor. Twenty-four hours later, in the retention trial, the rat was again placed in the light compartment, and the guillotine door was opened.…”
Section: Contextual Memorymentioning
confidence: 99%