2019
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.9b17943
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Passive Anti-Flooding Superhydrophobic Surfaces

Abstract: Superhydrophobic (SHPo) surfaces can provide high condensation heat transfer due to facilitated droplet removal. However, such high performance has been limited to low supersaturation conditions due to surface flooding. Here, we quantify flooding resistance defined as the rate of increase in the fraction of water-filled cavities with respect to the supersaturation level. Based on the quantitative understanding of surface flooding, we suggest effective anti-flooding strategies through tailoring the nanoscale co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, because the confinement effect of the holes becomes stronger when S / R decreases, the deviation in the shedding radius of droplets gets smaller, indicating a better regulation of the droplet shedding size. The maximum droplet shedding radius for RIPS with S = 75 μm is decreased down to ∼25 μm, even smaller than that for the state-of-the-art superhydrophobic surfaces with low surface energy. Figure e shows the time evolution of the cumulative water collection weights for these five samples. As shown, the cumulative weight of condensate on RIPS exhibits a perfect linear relationship versus time, indicating that the suction condensation is stable without deterioration.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Moreover, because the confinement effect of the holes becomes stronger when S / R decreases, the deviation in the shedding radius of droplets gets smaller, indicating a better regulation of the droplet shedding size. The maximum droplet shedding radius for RIPS with S = 75 μm is decreased down to ∼25 μm, even smaller than that for the state-of-the-art superhydrophobic surfaces with low surface energy. Figure e shows the time evolution of the cumulative water collection weights for these five samples. As shown, the cumulative weight of condensate on RIPS exhibits a perfect linear relationship versus time, indicating that the suction condensation is stable without deterioration.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…To delay the occurrence of flooding for achieving stable jumping droplets, various superhydrophobic surfaces with closely spaced nanostructures (Figure 9a) have been recently proposed to spatially control nucleation [66,98,99]. Minimizing the spacings using high-aspect ratio nanowires can promote to obtain a vapor density difference between the inside and outside of the nanoscale spacing.…”
Section: Condensation On Superhydrophobic Surfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the degree of supersaturation increases, the superhydrophobicity becomes unstable, causing any improvements to the condensation heat exchange performance to be lost [ 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 ]. In order to address this issue, several studies have explored techniques to control the degree of supersaturation so that superhydrophobicity can be maintained [ 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%