2015
DOI: 10.3390/s150613326
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Passive Acoustic Source Localization at a Low Sampling Rate Based on a Five-Element Cross Microphone Array

Abstract: Accurate acoustic source localization at a low sampling rate (less than 10 kHz) is still a challenging problem for small portable systems, especially for a multitasking micro-embedded system. A modification of the generalized cross-correlation (GCC) method with the up-sampling (US) theory is proposed and defined as the US-GCC method, which can improve the accuracy of the time delay of arrival (TDOA) and source location at a low sampling rate. In this work, through the US operation, an input signal with a certa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When multiplied by the speed of the light, c , this results in a maximum location error of 3 cm for each time measurement. In this case, if the TDoA between two antennas multiplied by c is 1 m, digitalizing the discrete TDoA, with a 3-cm error, will result in an overall location error of 0.99 m or 1.02 m. However, suitable interpolation between time sampled points can reduce the location error magnitude [ 29 ]. In the previous example, interpolating with 10 samples between time points, the effective sampling frequency may be increased to = 100 GS/s, and is effectively reduced to 0.01 ns, resulting in an location error of around 3 mm (see Section 4.2 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When multiplied by the speed of the light, c , this results in a maximum location error of 3 cm for each time measurement. In this case, if the TDoA between two antennas multiplied by c is 1 m, digitalizing the discrete TDoA, with a 3-cm error, will result in an overall location error of 0.99 m or 1.02 m. However, suitable interpolation between time sampled points can reduce the location error magnitude [ 29 ]. In the previous example, interpolating with 10 samples between time points, the effective sampling frequency may be increased to = 100 GS/s, and is effectively reduced to 0.01 ns, resulting in an location error of around 3 mm (see Section 4.2 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simulation charge amount of each sensor can be obtained through Equation (19), and then the distance measurement accuracy can be calculated from Equation (17). The calculation of elevation and azimuth errors is the same.…”
Section: Error Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The technology of target localization and tracking has become a research hotspot in various fields [16][17][18][19]. Reference [20] proposed a WSN (wireless sensor network) positioning algorithm based on fuzzy decision-making.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cross-correlation algorithms are widely used in various fields of digital signal processing. Typical applications comprise image processing [1], audio signal processing [2], impedance spectroscopy [3] and sound source localization [2]. Especially for sound source localization, approaches like time difference of arrival (TDOA) are used, a technique to calculate the position of a sound source by computing the delay between incoming sound signals of spatially divided microphones [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%