2015
DOI: 10.1017/s0031819115000224
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Passions of the Intellect: A Study of Polemics

Abstract: Polemics are a sort of critique typically suffused with inimical emotions and passions. But how are these emotions and passions to be construed? Neither authorial expression nor actual arousal properly account for their role in polemics. Rather, the polemicist must stage an unequal battle between a polemical self and the polemical target vis-à-vis an anticipated audience, skilfully handling, through his or her words, the emotions ascribed to each of them.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(39) In addition to such rationality, as the epigraph of this chapter shows, he maps out his polemics as an emotional enterprise. (40) Whenever I exerted myself to refute the Christians during my disputes [Ar. munādhara] with them, I experienced a [feeling of] exaltation and exhilaration sent upon me from God, so that I was honoured in their eyes [...].…”
Section: I a Non-pragmaphilology Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(39) In addition to such rationality, as the epigraph of this chapter shows, he maps out his polemics as an emotional enterprise. (40) Whenever I exerted myself to refute the Christians during my disputes [Ar. munādhara] with them, I experienced a [feeling of] exaltation and exhilaration sent upon me from God, so that I was honoured in their eyes [...].…”
Section: I a Non-pragmaphilology Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%