Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2022
DOI: 10.1155/2022/5872225
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Passenger Flow Prediction Using Smart Card Data from Connected Bus System Based on Interpretable XGBoost

Abstract: Bus passenger flow prediction is a critical component of advanced transportation information system for public traffic management, control, and dispatch. With the development of artificial intelligence, many previous studies attempted to apply machine learning models to extract comprehensive correlations from transit networks to improve passenger flow prediction accuracy, given that the variety and volume of traffic data have been easily obtained. The passenger flow on a station is highly affected by various f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our analysis, a synergic impact is observed in relation to SDG 9.1.1 (rural population near an all-season road) and SDG 9.1.2 (transport) since AI for land management might support the mapping and monitoring of population close to road facilities [51,188,189] as well as the volume of passengers and freight from Big Data coming from transportation systems [190][191][192], and their evolution patterns over time. An ambivalent impact regarding the contribution to SDG 9.4.1 (CO2 emissions) is observed since AI for land could be useful to calculate the carbon footprint based on LCAs from different activities, forest extension, and soil features acting as carbon sinks [193,194].…”
Section: Group 3: Ai As a DImentioning
confidence: 84%
“…In our analysis, a synergic impact is observed in relation to SDG 9.1.1 (rural population near an all-season road) and SDG 9.1.2 (transport) since AI for land management might support the mapping and monitoring of population close to road facilities [51,188,189] as well as the volume of passengers and freight from Big Data coming from transportation systems [190][191][192], and their evolution patterns over time. An ambivalent impact regarding the contribution to SDG 9.4.1 (CO2 emissions) is observed since AI for land could be useful to calculate the carbon footprint based on LCAs from different activities, forest extension, and soil features acting as carbon sinks [193,194].…”
Section: Group 3: Ai As a DImentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Before operators could automatically collect large quantities of occupancy data, surveyors were tasked with counting passengers at critical locations of the transportation network to assess the passenger numbers and derive the transportation demand [7]. With the emergence of ITS around 2000, data collection has been simplified [17]: Data sources such as the data of automated fare collection (AFC) systems [18], or APC systems with cameras, light barriers, LiDAR [19], weight sensors [20], Wi-Fi data [21,22], or crowdsourcing [23,24] became available. Some of these data sources continually transmit their data to an ITS; thus, real-time passenger information systems became possible.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ensemble Learning combines many smaller machine learning models with low accuracy into a larger model with better accuracy. Random forest (RF) [43], gradient boosting regression tree [43], LightGBM [44], and XGBoost [18] algorithms have been proposed for passenger load and flow prediction. Boosted models often have an advantage over non-boosted models, but for noisy data, they tend to overfit.…”
Section: A Forecasting Models For Passenger Load Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data imbalance is an obvious problem for customer loss forecasting model. The experimental purpose of this section is to explore the influence of different sampling methods on customer loss prediction model [ 26 , 27 ]. In this experiment, there are four methods to deal with data imbalance: (1) imbalance; (2) Random upsampling; (3) SMOTE; and (4) SMOTE Tomek-link.…”
Section: Experiments and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%