2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.intell.2020.101431
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PASS theory of intelligence and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This theory of brain function provided a blueprint for test development, which excluded traditional, academically-laden subtests that demand knowledge (e.g., Vocabulary, Arithmetic) and allowed more equitable measurement. Although the evidence of validity and reliability as well as clinical utility of PASS scores is beyond the scope of this study, Naglieri and Otero (2017) have reported that PASS scores (a) are more predictive of achievement test scores than any other ability test (see also Georgiou et al, 2020, for recent evidence from a meta-analysis); (b) show distinctive profiles for different children with different disabilities; (c) can be used for specific learning disabilities eligibility determination consistent with Federal Law using the discrepancy consistency method of analyzing a pattern of strengths and weaknesses in PASS and achievement scores; (d) can be readily used for instructional planning and interventions and, perhaps most importantly for gifted students, (e) offer the most equitable way to measure diverse populations (Naglieri & Otero, 2017). GEORGIOU ET AL.…”
Section: The Pass Theory Of Intelligencementioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This theory of brain function provided a blueprint for test development, which excluded traditional, academically-laden subtests that demand knowledge (e.g., Vocabulary, Arithmetic) and allowed more equitable measurement. Although the evidence of validity and reliability as well as clinical utility of PASS scores is beyond the scope of this study, Naglieri and Otero (2017) have reported that PASS scores (a) are more predictive of achievement test scores than any other ability test (see also Georgiou et al, 2020, for recent evidence from a meta-analysis); (b) show distinctive profiles for different children with different disabilities; (c) can be used for specific learning disabilities eligibility determination consistent with Federal Law using the discrepancy consistency method of analyzing a pattern of strengths and weaknesses in PASS and achievement scores; (d) can be readily used for instructional planning and interventions and, perhaps most importantly for gifted students, (e) offer the most equitable way to measure diverse populations (Naglieri & Otero, 2017). GEORGIOU ET AL.…”
Section: The Pass Theory Of Intelligencementioning
confidence: 94%
“…Several studies have established that planning, attention, simultaneous, and successive (PASS) neurocognitive processes as measured by the cognitive assessment system (CAS; Naglieri & Das, 1997) are significant predictors of academic achievement across languages (e.g., English: Das et al, 2008;Greek: Papadopoulos, 2001;Chinese: Wang et al, 2012), ethnicities (e.g., Naglieri et al, 2007), and developmental levels (e.g., Naglieri & Rojahn, 2004). Importantly, Georgiou et al (2020) reported meta-analytic results showing correlations between PASS scores and reading or math that were significantly stronger than correlations reported in previous meta-analyses for other measures of intelligence. They concluded that "there are significant benefits if we conceptualize intelligence as a constellation of cognitive processes that are linked to the functional organization of the brain" (p. 10).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A thorough assessment of the conditional background induced by those three analytical axes is of utmost importance when explaining students' AA. Cognitive ability has long been considered the most essential determinant of AA [11,12]. Not surprisingly, students' scores can be anticipated accurately from their Intelligence Quotient [13], despite the significant role that is left for other important factors [14].…”
Section: -Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature has extensively confirmed the student's cognitive ability as the main determinant of AA [10,11]. However, on average, it leaves unexplained 51-75% of the total variance [12].…”
Section: -Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%