2019
DOI: 10.1142/s0218194019500232
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PASER: A Pattern-Based Approach to Service Requirements Analysis

Abstract: Inconsistent specification are an inevitable intermediate product of a service requirements engineering process. In order to reduce requirements inconsistencies, we propose PASER, a Pattern-based Approach to Service Requirements analysis. The PASER approach first extracts the process information from service documents via natural language processing (NLP) techniques, then uses a requirements modeling language – Workflow-Patterns-based Process Language (WPPL) — to build the process model. Finally, through match… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…erefore, the more popular the domain is, the more invoked the open API in this domain will be. We use (16) to calculate the open API popularity:…”
Section: Mathematical Problems In Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…erefore, the more popular the domain is, the more invoked the open API in this domain will be. We use (16) to calculate the open API popularity:…”
Section: Mathematical Problems In Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In response to the above challenges, a number of open APIs selection approaches have been proposed, including keyword-based discovery approaches [8,9], topic modelbased discovery approaches [10,11], content-based recommendation approaches [12,13], and QoS-based recommendation approaches [14,15]. Yet, there are some problems with these studies: (1) Most established approaches use nonnatural language (NL) text to describe Mashup requirements [16], such as WSDL, which is not user friendly. e existing techniques do not work well with text modeling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%