2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2021.103951
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PASCLex: A comprehensive post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) symptom lexicon derived from electronic health record clinical notes

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent systematic review of 38 papers reported that one-third or more of surviving COVID-19 patients experienced at least one PASC symptom during the 2-5 months after the onset of acute infection 1 . PASC symptoms are numerous and varied, impacting virtually every major organ system (https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/long-term-effects/index.html) 2,3 and can last for weeks or months. Despite the large number of individuals affected, the lack of consensus diagnostic criteria or standardized outcome measures impede efforts to effectively group persons to establish clinical etiologies or to evaluate outcomes for therapeutic trials 4 .…”
Section: Main Textmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent systematic review of 38 papers reported that one-third or more of surviving COVID-19 patients experienced at least one PASC symptom during the 2-5 months after the onset of acute infection 1 . PASC symptoms are numerous and varied, impacting virtually every major organ system (https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/long-term-effects/index.html) 2,3 and can last for weeks or months. Despite the large number of individuals affected, the lack of consensus diagnostic criteria or standardized outcome measures impede efforts to effectively group persons to establish clinical etiologies or to evaluate outcomes for therapeutic trials 4 .…”
Section: Main Textmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although not much research has investigated the issue, the use of electronic health systems may make it more difficult for patients and physicians to interact with one another. According to the findings of Shachak's study, 92 percent of doctors think that the growing usage of the electronic health system has decreased the amount of face-to-face time that is spent between patients and their doctors [20]. The completion of electronic documentation requires the use of a computer, which may be timeconsuming for physicians, particularly if they are not proficient in its usage.…”
Section: Interference With Doctor-patient Relationshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to research conducted by Pizziferri and other academics who have focused their attention on this topic, the majority of medical professionals have avoided "sacrificing time with patients or total clinic time, but they do spend more time on paperwork outside of clinic sessions" both before and after the implementation of an electronic health system [20]. According to the same research, electronic health systems do increase the amount of labor that physicians have to perform; but, given the absence of further studies to back up these statements, we should proceed with caution.…”
Section: More Time and Attention Are Spent On Each Individual Patientmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current understandings of COVID-19 symptoms are primarily established on clinical data from medical institutions [20][21][22] , such as electronic health records (EHRs). However, nearly 80% of patients with asymptomatic or mild symptoms are not promptly or never clinically diagnosed and treated [23][24][25] , leading to potential missing information for mild and early symptoms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current understandings of COVID-19 symptoms are primarily established on clinical data from medical institutions [20][21][22] , such as electronic health records (EHRs). However, nearly 80% of All rights reserved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%