2016
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Party Selection for Integrated Project Delivery Based on Interorganizational Transactive Memory System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sarkar and colleagues attempted to develop a framework for integrated lean project delivery methods in India (Sarkar, 2015;Sarkar & Mangrola, 2016). Zhang et al (2016) provide a new method to select project parties for IPD-projects. Ma et al (2018) suggests a collaboration platform for IPD projects to improve the efficiency of IPD collaboration.…”
Section: Integrated Project Deliverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sarkar and colleagues attempted to develop a framework for integrated lean project delivery methods in India (Sarkar, 2015;Sarkar & Mangrola, 2016). Zhang et al (2016) provide a new method to select project parties for IPD-projects. Ma et al (2018) suggests a collaboration platform for IPD projects to improve the efficiency of IPD collaboration.…”
Section: Integrated Project Deliverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study conducted by Lee et al [74] found that collaboration contributes toward team integration. Moreover, it has been stated that the frequent interaction of project parties in IPD projects foster mutual trust and improve team collaboration [75,76]. Another study carried out by Mollaoglu-Korkmaz et al [77] revealed that factors such as the early involvement of the contractor in the project can be useful for team integration.…”
Section: Integrated Project Delivery (Ipd)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to establish the link, we have relied on a model developed by Adair (1988) that is centred around fulfilling the various needs of teams in order to optimise collaboration. These needs are task needs (the need to accomplish something), team needs (the Conley and Gregory (1999), Bresnen and Marshall (2000), Cheng et al (2001), Naoum (2003), Cheng and Li (2004), Bresnen (2007), Bygballe et al (2010), Eriksson (2010), Hartmann and Bresnen (2011), Børve et al (2017), Sparkling et al (2017), Hosseini et al (2018) Integrated project delivery Matthews and Howell (2005), Sarkar (2015), Sarkar and Mangrola (2016), Zhang et al (2016) Collaborative project delivery Love et al (1998), Rahman and Kumaraswamy (2005), Kantola and Saari (2016) need to develop and maintain working relationships among participants), and individual needs (people work in teams to fulfil their individual needs and not only because of their interest in the task). A collaborative project delivery method must consist of contractual, cultural and organisational elements aligned in such a way that they will fulfil the task as well as the needs of both the team, and individuals on that team.…”
Section: Design Of a Highperformance Buildingmentioning
confidence: 99%