2019
DOI: 10.1177/0032321719841243
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Party Identification, the Policy Space and Business Donations to Political Parties

Abstract: Political finance scholars have paid little attention to the partisan preferences of business donors. This was because business donors were overwhelmingly concerned with the left-right dimension and enjoyed stable relationships with centre-right parties. These parties are increasingly tempted by economic nationalism. This new ideological flux provides an opportunity to measure the extent to which donors are party identifiers or react to changes in the policy space. Dramatic shifts in party policy on both the l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(30 reference statements)
0
2
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the outcome variable, campaign expenditure per annum in euro, is highly overdispersed, 6 negative binomial models (Hardin and Hilbe, 2007: 199–220) are feasible for estimating the effects on monetary count data (cf. McMenamin, 2020). Because the observations (branches’ annual campaign expenses) are nested within parties by states ( Länder ), we furthermore define random effects (i) for parties nested in states ( N = 96), (ii) years ( N = 9), and (iii) states ( N = 16 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the outcome variable, campaign expenditure per annum in euro, is highly overdispersed, 6 negative binomial models (Hardin and Hilbe, 2007: 199–220) are feasible for estimating the effects on monetary count data (cf. McMenamin, 2020). Because the observations (branches’ annual campaign expenses) are nested within parties by states ( Länder ), we furthermore define random effects (i) for parties nested in states ( N = 96), (ii) years ( N = 9), and (iii) states ( N = 16 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Siyasi partilerde örgütsel özdeşleşme ile ilgili Türkiye örneğinde yapılan bir çalışmaya rastlanmamıştır. Bu konuda yurtdışında gerçekleştirilen çalışmaların ise çok olduğu tespit edilmiştir (Achen, 2002;Goren, 2005;Greene, 1999;Johnston, 2006;McMenamin, 2020). Bu kapsamda, Amerika Birleşik Devletlerinde oy verme davranışına ilişkin ilk deneysel çalışmalarda keşfedilen ve kişinin tercih ettiği siyasi partiyle uzun vadeli psikolojik ve duygusal bağlılığı olarak ifade edilen siyasi partiyle özdeşleşme sosyal sınıf, dini mezhep ve diğer sosyal gruplarla özdeşleşmeye benzemektedir (Dalton, 2016).…”
Section: Siyasi Partilerde Değerler öZdeşleşme Ve Ses Davranışıunclassified
“…Dito isso, é importante questionar o porquê de as empresas contribuírem para o financiamento das campanhas. A bibliografia especializada argumenta que as principais motivações dos doadores são duas: 1) ideológica: os doadores buscam fomentar políticas e bens públicos, comportamento mais comum de pessoas físicas e; 2) pragmática: buscam recursos para suas atividades através de sua relação com o Estado, que constitui um importante local de negócios, mais praticado por empresários (Carazza, 2018;Claessens et al, 2008;McMenamin, 2012McMenamin, , 2013McMenamin, , 2019Mancuso et al, 2021).…”
Section: O Financiamento Eleitoral Nos Estudos Partidáriosunclassified