2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.10.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parturient recall of neuraxial analgesia risks: Impact of labor pain vs no labor pain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…When considering quantitative data, the women appeared to be aware of the risks associated with epidurals, knew of other pain relief options and seemed to be satisfied with the information provided in the antenatal period (Halls, 2008; Henry & Nand, 2004; Jackson, Henry, Avery, Vandenkerkhof, & Milne, 2000; Kamarzaman, Clark, Haque, & Ghani, 2011; Mahomed et al., 2015; Toledo et al., 2017). However, when considering the more detailed findings mostly provided by qualitative studies, women reported a lack of information on epidural analgesia and described their attempts at accessing the right information as not always satisfactory (Burkle, Olsen, Sviggum, & Jacob, 2017; Mahomed et al., 2015; Newnham et al., 2017; Toledo et al., 2017; Yoshioka et al., 2012). Epidural information was scant and consent was brief, often verbal, with women not required to understand the full list of side effects or possible risks (Newnham et al., 2017; Yoshioka et al., 2012).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When considering quantitative data, the women appeared to be aware of the risks associated with epidurals, knew of other pain relief options and seemed to be satisfied with the information provided in the antenatal period (Halls, 2008; Henry & Nand, 2004; Jackson, Henry, Avery, Vandenkerkhof, & Milne, 2000; Kamarzaman, Clark, Haque, & Ghani, 2011; Mahomed et al., 2015; Toledo et al., 2017). However, when considering the more detailed findings mostly provided by qualitative studies, women reported a lack of information on epidural analgesia and described their attempts at accessing the right information as not always satisfactory (Burkle, Olsen, Sviggum, & Jacob, 2017; Mahomed et al., 2015; Newnham et al., 2017; Toledo et al., 2017; Yoshioka et al., 2012). Epidural information was scant and consent was brief, often verbal, with women not required to understand the full list of side effects or possible risks (Newnham et al., 2017; Yoshioka et al., 2012).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Women reported a lack of information on epidural analgesia and described their attempts at accessing the right information as not always satisfactory (Burkle et al., 2017; Mahomed et al., 2015; Newnham et al., 2017; Toledo et al., 2017; Yoshioka et al., 2012). As epidural information is disparate and midwives might not consider providing detailed information about epidural to be a primary aim of their role (Newnham et al., 2017), healthcare professionals should not assume pregnant women have read and understood the implications of an epidural.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors should be congratulated for performing a well-designed study in an important topic (e.g., acute pain) in patients undergoing elective surgery (Chen, Tang, Zhang, Jiang, & Liu, 2017;Oda, Izumi, Aso, & Ikeuchi, 2018). The need to improve post-operative recovery by reducing moderate to severe post-operative pain makes the topic very important in perioperative medicine (Burkle, Olsen, Sviggum, & Jacob, 2017;Shick, Lebovitz, & Conrad, 2017).…”
Section: Comment On a Paper By Ibrahim Et Al Entitledmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors should be commended for performing a well-designed trial in an important topic (e.g., acute pain) in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery (2,3). The current emphasis on the need to improve overall postoperative recovery and patient satisfaction makes the topic very important in perioperative medicine (4,5).Although the study of Peng et al (1) was well conducted, there are some questions that could to be clarified by the authors that could be of benefit to the readers. First, the authors did not control for the use of intraoperative analgesics or anesthetics which are known to affect postoperative pain and subsequently recovery.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors should be commended for performing a well-designed trial in an important topic (e.g., acute pain) in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery (2,3). The current emphasis on the need to improve overall postoperative recovery and patient satisfaction makes the topic very important in perioperative medicine (4,5).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%