Inter and Intra Government Arrangements for Productivity 1998
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4757-2864-4_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Partnerships and Networks as Self-Organizing Systems: an Antidote to Principal-Agent Theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Promises of more efficient and innovative service delivery require governments to transfer tasks and risks to the private sector (Greve and Hodge ). Governments should leave the daily management of the PPP project to the private companies so that they can use their expertise, skills and creativity to determine how to execute, manage and monitor their tasks (Bovaird and Sharifi ). This paradigm is very much in line with the original principles of PPPs as it originated in the Private Finance Initiative in the UK.…”
Section: Governance Paradigms and Ppps: A Theoretical Explorationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Promises of more efficient and innovative service delivery require governments to transfer tasks and risks to the private sector (Greve and Hodge ). Governments should leave the daily management of the PPP project to the private companies so that they can use their expertise, skills and creativity to determine how to execute, manage and monitor their tasks (Bovaird and Sharifi ). This paradigm is very much in line with the original principles of PPPs as it originated in the Private Finance Initiative in the UK.…”
Section: Governance Paradigms and Ppps: A Theoretical Explorationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such the network can be considered to have the characteristics of a complex adapted system (Gleick, 1988). Such a network can be considered to provide an exemplar which refutes the argument of Bovaird and Sharifi (1998) concerning the danger of self-organising systems potentially damaging the welfare of vulnerable groups as the travellers themselves, according to most definition, would be considered to be such a vulnerable group. Interestingly the travellers themselves would not depict themselves in this manner and consider that they have a strong and vibrant community identity grounded in their aspirations.…”
Section: The Traveller Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%