2018
DOI: 10.1017/s1537592717004224
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Partners in Crime: An Empirical Evaluation of the CIA Rendition, Detention, and Interrogation Program

Abstract: In the years following the attacks of 9/11, the CIA adopted a program involving the capture, extraordinary rendition, secret detention, and harsh interrogation of suspected terrorists in the war on terror. As the details of this program have become public, a heated debate has ensued, focusing narrowly on whether or not this program “worked” by disrupting terror plots and saving American lives. By embracing such a narrow view of the program’s efficacy, this debate has failed to take into account the broader con… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The definition of implementation of the antitorture norm, in our mind, should involve not just how the norm is included in domestic, regional, and international institutions and adopted into domestic law, but also the degree to which such changes led to enforcement 25 See Schmidt and Sikkink (2018). and accountability.…”
Section: Implementation and Enforcementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The definition of implementation of the antitorture norm, in our mind, should involve not just how the norm is included in domestic, regional, and international institutions and adopted into domestic law, but also the degree to which such changes led to enforcement 25 See Schmidt and Sikkink (2018). and accountability.…”
Section: Implementation and Enforcementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The expectation of enforcement and accountability appears greatest in democratic states; therefore, regime type was also a factor shaping responses to US contestation. Even among the forty countries that participated actively with the US torture program, democratic participating states did not exhibit worsening human rights practices (Schmidt and Sikkink 2018). Thus we stress not just the level of legalization of the norm, but the degree to which institutionalization of the norm involves the expectation of enforcement and accountability.…”
Section: Assessing the Robustness Of The Torture Norm: Actors Procesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 7 I borrow this phrasing from Schmidt & Sikkink (2018), who use it in the context of interstate learning and norm diffusion. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aggregate averages are highly skewed, though respective median fatalities of 2 and 104 also suggest a significant gap between nonviolent and violent campaigns in terms of lethality.6 Or, more specifically, 'police state' in the context of fending off domestic challengers. 7 I borrow this phrasing fromSchmidt & Sikkink (2018), who use it in the context of interstate learning and norm diffusion.8 The army's initial troop count was nearly doubled by the end of the conflict. 9 Almost certainly a significant undercount.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%