The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2010
DOI: 10.1080/01446190903536422
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Partnering: what is it, when should it be used, and how should it be implemented?

Abstract: The interest in construction partnering has increased during the last decade. Much research has, however, found that cooperation and its benefits are not easily obtained, partly due to a lack of understanding of the partnering concept and when and how to implement it. The aim is therefore to increase this understanding by investigating three research questions: (1) What is partnering? (2) When should partnering be used and to what extent? (3) How should partnering be implemented? A thorough literature review a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
137
1
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(142 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
3
137
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Partnering is often conceptualized as a relationship between construction parties formally built on commitment, trust and common understanding, which can be achieved by putting the right procurement and contract mechanisms in place (Eriksson, 2010). From an activity theory perspective, such a conceptualization of partnering can be equated with an activity system that involves a close alignment between the actions of client and contractor.…”
Section: Analysis and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Partnering is often conceptualized as a relationship between construction parties formally built on commitment, trust and common understanding, which can be achieved by putting the right procurement and contract mechanisms in place (Eriksson, 2010). From an activity theory perspective, such a conceptualization of partnering can be equated with an activity system that involves a close alignment between the actions of client and contractor.…”
Section: Analysis and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fragmentation of project team (Horbury and Hope, 1999;Matthews and Rowlinson, 1999;Brabazon et al, 2000;Hide et al, 2003;Baiden et al, 2006;Eriksson, 2010;Greenwood and Wu, 2012) Design and Build Traditional procurement Management contracting Partnering Difficulty in constructing Brace et al, 2009) Simple Design…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As described in Nyström (2005) and Eriksson (2010), partnering can be given a number of more specific interpretations. Their view, and ours, is that partnering should be seen as a way to carry out a certain project in a more collaborative way, opening up for adjustments during the project.…”
Section: Partneringmentioning
confidence: 99%