2019 6th International Conference on Signal Processing and Integrated Networks (SPIN) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/spin.2019.8711704
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Partner Selection Based on Different Protocols in Cooperative Network by Using Nakagami-M Function

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…log(x s ), that can also represent the resistance of the traffic or find out the fairness of resource allocation. This type of objective is covertly achieved by TCP congestion control today [6] [12]. So, the optimization problem can be written as follows:" maximize ∑ U s (x s ) subject to Rx≤ c, x≥0 (1) "Here both R and x represents variables.…”
Section: Baggregate Utility Maximizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…log(x s ), that can also represent the resistance of the traffic or find out the fairness of resource allocation. This type of objective is covertly achieved by TCP congestion control today [6] [12]. So, the optimization problem can be written as follows:" maximize ∑ U s (x s ) subject to Rx≤ c, x≥0 (1) "Here both R and x represents variables.…”
Section: Baggregate Utility Maximizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also represent available paths by a matrix H where H s lj =1 if path j of source s uses link k and H s lj =0 otherwise. H does not necessarily present all possible paths in the physical topology, but a subset of paths chosen by operator or the routing protocol [6].…”
Section: Baggregate Utility Maximizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations