2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2005.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Partner, learn, progress: A conceptual model for continuous clinical education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
36
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The strengths of the current program are the strong focus on relationships between midwifery students and women, and early clinical exposure to professional practice. Henderson et al (2006) argue that learning requires collaboration and partnership that occurs on a personal level in the context of a broader social and political environment in the clinical venue. The need for a sense of belongingness has also been highlighted (Levett-Jones and Lathlean 2008).…”
Section: Symbiosis and Continuity Of Care Programmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strengths of the current program are the strong focus on relationships between midwifery students and women, and early clinical exposure to professional practice. Henderson et al (2006) argue that learning requires collaboration and partnership that occurs on a personal level in the context of a broader social and political environment in the clinical venue. The need for a sense of belongingness has also been highlighted (Levett-Jones and Lathlean 2008).…”
Section: Symbiosis and Continuity Of Care Programmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Learner readiness forms part of the factors that promote good attitude towards clinical work. This facilitates the learner to make sense of their observations and reflect on practice situations (Henderson et al, 2006). The fact that the students failed to ask questions could mean they were not ready to learn.…”
Section: The Use Of Mobile Phone and Participation Of General Ward Romentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Students engage in classes, clinical, study together, and interact with faculty and peers and learn by engaging in academic activities [44] . In this study inputs refer to the characteristics of student or demographic variables like gender, age, program, cohort, cumulative grade point average (cGPA), semester GPA (sGPA) and sibling studying in the university.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%