2002
DOI: 10.1006/jcta.2001.3237
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Partition Theorems for Layered Partial Semigroups

Abstract: We introduce the notions of layered semigroups and partial semigroups, and prove some Ramsey type partition results about them. These results generalize previous results of Gowers, Furstenberg, and of Bergelson, Blass, and Hindman. We give some applications of these results (see, e.g., Theorem 1.1) and present examples suggesting that our results are rather optimal.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A broad generalization of Gowers' theorem has been proved by Farah, Hindman, and McLeod in [3,Theorem 3.13] in the framework, developed therein, of layered partial semigroups and layered actions. Such a result provides, in particular, a common generalization of Gowers' theorem and the Hales-Jewett theorem; see [3,Theorem 3.15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A broad generalization of Gowers' theorem has been proved by Farah, Hindman, and McLeod in [3,Theorem 3.13] in the framework, developed therein, of layered partial semigroups and layered actions. Such a result provides, in particular, a common generalization of Gowers' theorem and the Hales-Jewett theorem; see [3,Theorem 3.15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…A broad generalization of Gowers' theorem has been proved by Farah, Hindman, and McLeod in [3,Theorem 3.13] in the framework, developed therein, of layered partial semigroups and layered actions. Such a result provides, in particular, a common generalization of Gowers' theorem and the Hales-Jewett theorem; see [3,Theorem 3.15]. As general as [3, Theorem 3.13] is, it nonetheless does not cover the case where one considers FIN k endowed with the multiple tetris operations described below, since these do not form a layered action in the sense of [3,Definition 3.3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A common generalization of Gowers' Ramsey theorem and the infinite Hales-Jewett theorems has been established by Farah-Hindman-McLeod in the setting of layered actions on adequate partial semigroups [10]. In a different direction, the infinite Gowers Ramsey theorem has been strengthened in [18] by considering multiple tetris operations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and a i,d ∈ L i for d ∈ ω and i ∈ k is monochromatic.More generally, one can regard any layered action on a partial semigroup S in the sense of[10, Definition 3.3] as an action of the tree I k on S in the sense of Definition 3.1. Any such an action is automatically Ramsey, although this is not easy to see directly.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%