1998
DOI: 10.1007/bfb0055344
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Partition refinement in real-time model checking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tools such as Uppaal [14], Kronos [6], and PMC [15] are now routinely used for industrial case studies. A disadvantage of the traditional approaches is, however, that they can only be used to verify concrete timing properties: one has to provide the values of all timing parameters that occur in the system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tools such as Uppaal [14], Kronos [6], and PMC [15] are now routinely used for industrial case studies. A disadvantage of the traditional approaches is, however, that they can only be used to verify concrete timing properties: one has to provide the values of all timing parameters that occur in the system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another approach [19] suggests using a partition refinement algorithm for efficient model checking. However, the reported running times are still exponential.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this article we propose a variant PDT of predicate diagrams, intended for the verification of real-time systems. We also show how to relate PDTs to real-time systems described as extended timed-automata graphs (XTGs), a formalism that combines timed automata and constraints for modeling infinite data domains [22,6]. Basically, a PDT shows a finite-state abstraction of an XTG, and the correctness of the abstraction can be established by proving a number of verification conditions expressed in first-order logic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%