2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2013.09.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Partition of mixed modes in layered isotropic double cantilever beams with non-rigid cohesive interfaces

Abstract: The authors' existing mixed-mode partition theories for rigid interfaces are extended to non-rigid cohesive interfaces for layered isotropic double cantilever beams. Within the context of Euler beam theory, it is shown that the two sets of orthogonal pure modes coincide at the first set of pure modes due to the absence of any crack tip stress singularity for a non-rigid interface. The total energy release rate in a mixed mode is then partitioned using this first set of pure modes without considering any 'steal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, they found an influence of shear forces and shear deformation on both fracture modes. Wang et al [46] compared several mixed-mode partition methods based on SBT and TBT with rigid and deformable interfaces. In general, they found that shear forces cause additional contributions to both modes I and II.…”
Section: Elastic-interface Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general, they found an influence of shear forces and shear deformation on both fracture modes. Wang et al [46] compared several mixed-mode partition methods based on SBT and TBT with rigid and deformable interfaces. In general, they found that shear forces cause additional contributions to both modes I and II.…”
Section: Elastic-interface Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides the adoption of a more or less refined structural theory for the sublaminates, the connection between them has to be suitably described. To this aim, models of growing complexity can be chosen, ranging from rigid connections [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] to elastic interfaces [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38] and cohesive zone models [39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47]. This choice is relevant not only for the accurate prediction of the laminate structural response -e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2][3][4][5][6] also shows that in Timoshenko beam theory with either rigid or non-rigid interfaces, these two sets of modes coincide on the first set of pure modes from Euler beam theory resulting in no stealthy interaction. Furthermore, Ref.…”
Section: Development Of the Novel Methodsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Conclusions are made in Section 4. Based on the authors' previous work [2][3][4][5], the total ERR G is calculated as follows: The work in Refs. [2][3][4]6] has shown that in Euler beam theory with rigid interfaces, the two sets of orthogonal pure modes do not coincide and that this results in 'stealthy' interactions which change the ERR partitions I G and II G but do not change the total ERR G .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(47) and (48), are determined using the orthogonal methodology [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34]. The pure mode II (18) to (24).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%