Partisan politics of skills in middle-income countries: Insiders, outsiders and the vocational education system of Turkey

Abstract

<jats:p> The literature on the political economy of development argues that many middle-income countries could not develop strong vocational education and training systems because of the lack of political coalitions that would support such systems. However, these researchers have overlooked the role of partisan politics, domain of political competition and the links of insiders and outsiders with political parties. This article addresses this gap by studying the case of Turkey in the 2000s, when the country was governed by the Justice and Development Party and experienced important changes in its vocational education and training system. It investigates the political shifts in these years and the impact of these shifts on vocational education and training policies. The article argues that the governing Justice and Development Party played a key role in the changes in the Turkish vocational education and training system. Small and medium enterprises and labour market outsiders, which were the outsiders of the political and economic system, formed Justice and Development Party’s main constituents. Different from the previous parties, Justice and Development Party focused on the economic interests of outsiders and vocational education and training became an important tool to address such interests of both groups. The Justice and Development Party governments integrated the interests of both small and medium enterprises and workers into the vocational education and training policies in the 2000s, which has led to a vocational education and training system with high state commitment, higher firm involvement and higher permeability between vocational and general education. This research is based on process-tracing of the political dynamics and vocational education and training system developments in Turkey in 2002–2011. The data comprise primary and secondary documents, as well as interviews with several stakeholders. </jats:p>

The causes of welfare state expansion in democratic middle‐income countries: A literature review

“…Yet, outside of Latin America, expansionary social reforms have been promoted by parties that are clearly different from classic left or right parties. Examples include the conservative‐liberal Thai Rak Thai Party in Thailand and the conservative‐liberal (but increasingly authoritarian‐nationalist) Justice and Development Party in Turkey, both of which initiated major social reforms (Harris, 2019; Sancak, 2020; Selway, 2011; Yilmaz, 2017). To arrive at more powerful cross‐regional theories of welfare state development in democratic middle‐income countries and the broader Global South, scholars will have to conceptualize the distinct welfare state agendas of such non‐left inclusionary parties, just as Northern theories needed to account for the “distinctive welfare state project” of Christian Democratic parties (Huber, Ragin, & Stephens, 1993, p. 712).…”

How Can Middle-income Countries Improve Their Skills Systems Post- COVID-19?

“…However, heterogeneity in the quality of middle-income country vocational training also reflects more complex political economy factors. Sancak (2020) argues that increased funding for and reforms to Turkey's vocational training system reflected Turkish party politics, and particularly the ruling AKP party's need to reward its core support base amongst "small and medium enterprises and labour market outsiders". Similarly, Doner and Schneider (2020) argues that vocational training systems in today's advanced economies developed thanks to the demands of broad coalitions of interest that are lacking in today's middle-income countries due to "fragmentation of social groups."…”