2013
DOI: 10.1515/bap-2012-0037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Partisan policy promises and sector-specific stock-market performance: evidence from Mexico's 2006 presidential campaign

Abstract: Scholars have long held that partisan politics cause aggregate-level fluctuations in markets. However, if investors hold different policy preferences, the effects of election campaigns on their behavior should be more nuanced. In particular, investors in economic sectors benefiting from neo-liberal economic policies might respond favorably to gains in support by right-leaning candidates, whereas those expected to profit from state-led economic development might react favorably to gains by left-leaning contende… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 32 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet the PBC symptoms are much more prevalent in non-industrialized nations with democratic political structures (Block and Vaaler, 2004). In addition, the adverse impacts on economic growth and societal development of emerging nations facing regime instability (whether linked or unrelated to elections) are more severe, leading to far more dramatic shifts in stock-market returns and/or volatility (Benton, 2013;Chau et al, 2014;Jensen and Schmith, 2005;Lumiajiak et al, 2014). Obinger et al (2014) Setting up reforms in umbral legislation to make policy changes more complicated, and implementing substantial restrictive measures shortly after the general elections, are examples that also support the notion of the PBC.…”
Section: Political Business Cyclementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet the PBC symptoms are much more prevalent in non-industrialized nations with democratic political structures (Block and Vaaler, 2004). In addition, the adverse impacts on economic growth and societal development of emerging nations facing regime instability (whether linked or unrelated to elections) are more severe, leading to far more dramatic shifts in stock-market returns and/or volatility (Benton, 2013;Chau et al, 2014;Jensen and Schmith, 2005;Lumiajiak et al, 2014). Obinger et al (2014) Setting up reforms in umbral legislation to make policy changes more complicated, and implementing substantial restrictive measures shortly after the general elections, are examples that also support the notion of the PBC.…”
Section: Political Business Cyclementioning
confidence: 99%