Particulate Matter in New Technology Diesel Exhaust (NTDE) is Quantitatively and Qualitatively Very Different from that Found in Traditional Diesel Exhaust (TDE)

Abstract

Diesel exhaust (DE) characteristic of pre-1988 engines is classified as a "probable" human carcinogen (Group 2A) by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has classified DE as "likely to be carcinogenic to humans." These classifications were based on the large body of health effect studies conducted on DE over the past 30 or so years. However, increasingly stringent U.S. emissions standards for particulate matter (PM) and nitrogen oxides (NO x ) in diesel exhaust have helped stimulate major technological advances in diesel engine technology and diesel fuel/lubricant composition, resulting in the emergence of what has been termed New Technology Diesel Exhaust, or NTDE. NTDE is defined as DE from post-2006 and older retrofit diesel engines that incorporate a variety of technological advancements, including electronic controls, ultra-low-sulfur diesel fuel, oxidation catalysts, and wall-flow diesel particulate filters (DPFs). As discussed in a prior review (T. W. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42, 6437-6445), numerous emissions characterization studies have demonstrated marked differences in regulated and unregulated emissions between NTDE and "traditional diesel exhaust" (TDE) from pre-1988 diesel engines. Now there exist even more data demonstrating significant chemical and physical distinctions between the diesel exhaust particulate (DEP) in NTDE versus DEP from pre-2007 diesel technology, and its greater resemblance to particulate emissions from compressed natural gas (CNG) or gasoline engines. Furthermore, preliminary toxicological data suggest that the changes to the physical and chemical composition of NTDE lead to differences in biological responses between NTDE versus TDE exposure. Ongoing studies are expected to address some of the remaining data gaps in the understanding of possible NTDE health effects, but there is now sufficient evidence to conclude that health effects studies of pre-2007 DE likely have little relevance in assessing the potential health risks of NTDE exposures. INTRODUCTIONDiesel-engine exhaust (DE) exposures and health effects have been studied extensively for decades. DE is a source of particulate matter (PM), nitrogen oxides (NO x ), carbon monoxide (CO), and a number of air toxics (e.g., aldehydes,

Public health and components of particulate matter: The changing assessment of black carbon

“…Diesel engine exhaust takes a bad rap in the CR. Hesterberg et al (2011) make a convincing argument that modern engines, fuels, and exhaust treatment make the smoke-belching exhaust pipe a thing of the past, consistent with D. Greenbaum's observations. Emission reductions are so large that it seems the gravimetric analysis used for engine emission certification standards (DieselNet, 2013) is not sensitive enough to quantify mass emissions.…”

Adopting Clean Fuels and Technologies on School Buses. Pollution and Health Impacts in Children

“…nitro-PAH formation and nucleation can occur with clean air technologies (46,49,50). The finding that ULSD and DOCs were most strongly and consistently associated with health suggests that UFPs may be a critical exposure on school buses.…”

Organic aerosols in the southeastern United States: Speciated particulate carbon measurements from the SEARCH network, 2006–2010

“…Ultralow sulfur (<15 ppm) diesel (ULSD) fuel, necessary for the proper functioning of diesel particulate filters and catalytic converters, was required for highway (on-road) diesel vehicles beginning in 2007 (U.S. EPA, 2011). Emissions of PM from post-2006 on-road diesel engines and retrofitted earlier-model diesel vehicles are less than one-tenth the emissions from diesel vehicles that do not comply with EPA's on-road heavy-duty diesel engine (HDDE) emissions standard of 0.01 g per bhp-h (Hesterberg et al, 2011). The average reductions of 2007 relative to 2004 HDDE emissions range from 71 to 99% for a variety of organic compounds, including single-ring aromatics, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), alkanes, hopanes, steranes, alcohols, organic acids, and carbonyls (Hesterberg et al, 2011).…”

“…Emissions of PM from post-2006 on-road diesel engines and retrofitted earlier-model diesel vehicles are less than one-tenth the emissions from diesel vehicles that do not comply with EPA's on-road heavy-duty diesel engine (HDDE) emissions standard of 0.01 g per bhp-h (Hesterberg et al, 2011). The average reductions of 2007 relative to 2004 HDDE emissions range from 71 to 99% for a variety of organic compounds, including single-ring aromatics, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), alkanes, hopanes, steranes, alcohols, organic acids, and carbonyls (Hesterberg et al, 2011). Low sulfur diesel (500 ppm) and ULSD fuels were phased in for non-road, locomotive, and marine engines between 2007 and 2014 (U.S. EPA, 2013c).…”