2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Particulate concentrations during on-farm combustion of energy crops of different shapes and harvest seasons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The differences in the chemical composition of ash biomass could be caused by agricultural operations. A plausible hypothesis is that on-field shredding with the forage harvester produced a loss of biomass material such as leaves, which are known to contain higher nutrient amounts (Fournela et al, 2015;Prohnow et al, 2009). Theis et al (2006) conducted a comparison of the straw, peat, and bark ash deposition behaviours with different chemical compositions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The differences in the chemical composition of ash biomass could be caused by agricultural operations. A plausible hypothesis is that on-field shredding with the forage harvester produced a loss of biomass material such as leaves, which are known to contain higher nutrient amounts (Fournela et al, 2015;Prohnow et al, 2009). Theis et al (2006) conducted a comparison of the straw, peat, and bark ash deposition behaviours with different chemical compositions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They provide high-quality feed thanks to high and stable fodder and seed productivity, longevity and winter hardiness. Perennial grasses are essential in protecting soils from water and wind erosion [1,2,3]. A significant reserve for increasing fodder supply is expanding the range of forage plants, replacing low-yielding species with more productive ones of enhanced nutritive values adapted to the soil and climatic conditions of cultivation [3,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PM sampling line included a stainless steel nozzle (12.5 mm in diameter), a stainless steel probe (600 mm long), an S-type Pitot tube, a 75-mm glass fibre filter (Whatman 934-AH, GE Healthcare, Mississauga, ON, Canada) inserted into a Pyrex filter holder installed in a heated compartment maintained at 120 °C, four impingers connected in series in an ice bath, a metering system (XC-563 Digital Meter Console, Apex Instruments, Fuquay-Varina, NC, USA) and a vacuum pump. More details on PM sampling method are given here [42].…”
Section: Gas and Particulate Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%