Particles in turbulent separated flow over a bump: Effect of the Stokes number and lift force

Abstract

Particle-laden turbulent flow that separates due to a bump inside a channel is simulated to analyse the effects of the Stokes number and the lift force on the particle spatial distribution. The fluid friction Reynolds number is approximately 900 over the bump, the highest achieved for similar computational domains. A range of particle Stokes numbers are considered, each simulated with and without the lift force in the particle dynamic equation. When the lift force is included a significant difference in the particle concentration, in the order of thousands, is observed in comparison with cases where the lift force is omitted. The greatest deviation is in regions of high vorticity, particularly at the walls and in the shear layer but results show that the concentration also changes in the bulk of the flow away from the walls. The particle behaviour changes drastically when the Stokes number is varied. As the Stokes number increases, particles bypass the recirculating region that is formed after the bump and their redistribution is mostly affected by the strong shear layer. Particles segregate at the walls and particularly accumulate in secondary recirculating regions behind the bump. At higher Stokes numbers, the particles create reflection layers of high concentration due to their inertia as they are diverted by the bump. The fluid flow is less influential and this enables the particles to enter the recirculating region by rebounding off walls and create a focus of high particle concentration.

Turbulent drag reduction over curved walls

“…dissipation of turbulent kinetic energy were analysed via the generalized Kolmogorov equation. In Mollicone et al (2019) a similar set-up, with a smooth bump defined by a cosine function, was used to study particle-laden flows at finite values of the Stokes number.…”

Exploring Lagrangian Modelling Approach for Nanoparticle Transport in Microchannels

“…( 9) .Here, 𝜏𝜏 p denotes the particle response time, and 𝜏𝜏 f stands for the characteristic response time of the fluid. However, high Stokes number indicates that particles exhibit more inertia-driven behaviour and are less affected by fluid flow [28].However, the continuum description of the fluid phase is justified based on Knudsen number , in our specific case, stands at a value of 0.001. Consequently, no slip-boundary effects are observed at the interface between the fluid and particle phases.…”

Drag increase and turbulence augmentation in two-way coupled particle-laden wall-bounded flows

“…The presence of flow confinement introduces additional complexity. The preferential segregation of the particles near the walls [10][11][12] leads the particles to a↵ect the turbulence in the bu↵er-layer 13 . It follows a modification of the regeneration cycle of the vortical structures, and of the flow topology [14][15][16][17] , which ultimately manifests, at least for finite-size neutrally buoyant particles, in a modification of the well-known law of the wall 18 .…”