2004
DOI: 10.1049/ip-smt:20040631
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Particle swarm optimisation for Pareto optimal solutions in electromagnetic shape design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The closer an individual is to the Pareto-optimal front, the higher the probability is to participate in the creation of the next generation. A Paretooptimal solution is defined as the best achievable value for one objective without deteriorating at least one of the other objectives [41]. The crowding distance criterion [42] is implemented in order to maintain the diversity in each generation and to avoid the convergence to very similar solutions.…”
Section: Design Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The closer an individual is to the Pareto-optimal front, the higher the probability is to participate in the creation of the next generation. A Paretooptimal solution is defined as the best achievable value for one objective without deteriorating at least one of the other objectives [41]. The crowding distance criterion [42] is implemented in order to maintain the diversity in each generation and to avoid the convergence to very similar solutions.…”
Section: Design Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several algorithms to find the non‐inferior points in a multiobjective optimisation problem. Such as the GA [16], differential evolution [17], particle swarm optimisation [18], and simulated annealing [19] received more attention.…”
Section: Multiobjective Optimisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lately, the real-life case studies of a neural network with stochastic search learning algorithm are developed [29]- [33]. PSO can solve multiobjective problems by using Pareto theory [34], [35] and penalty weight [36].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%