2019
DOI: 10.1504/ijsom.2019.097040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Particle swarm optimisation algorithm and multi-start simulated annealing algorithm for scheduling batches of parts in multi-cell flexible manufacturing system

Abstract: This paper considers the problem of scheduling batches of parts in a multi-cell flexible manufacturing system (MCFMS) with sequence dependent batch setup time. The goal is to find the best sequence of batches and hence to minimise the makespan. Two mathematical models are developed namely: batch availability model and job availability model. As the problem is known to be NP-hard, particle swarm optimisation (PSO) algorithm and multi-start simulated annealing (MSA) algorithm are proposed to solve the problem. T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 47 publications
(86 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In their recent article, Allahverdi et al [11] provide a comprehensive overview of the studies conducted on the problems of flow-shop and permutation flow-shop. In recent studies, Balaji and Porselvi [12] consider the problem of scheduling batches of parts in a multicell flexible manufacturing system with batch setup time. e goal is to find the best sequence of batches and thus minimize the time interval.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their recent article, Allahverdi et al [11] provide a comprehensive overview of the studies conducted on the problems of flow-shop and permutation flow-shop. In recent studies, Balaji and Porselvi [12] consider the problem of scheduling batches of parts in a multicell flexible manufacturing system with batch setup time. e goal is to find the best sequence of batches and thus minimize the time interval.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%