2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.swevo.2017.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Particle swarm clustering fitness evaluation with computational centroids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For all algorithms, the same cluster seed and termination conditions are used. The Clustering Fitness (CF) for one of the possible clustering results C, is calculated according to (17) [22]. (17) Where λ is the experiential weight, (0 < λ < 1), S ra (c) is the intra-cluster and Ser(c) is the inter-cluster similarity for the cluster c i .…”
Section: Clustering Fitness Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For all algorithms, the same cluster seed and termination conditions are used. The Clustering Fitness (CF) for one of the possible clustering results C, is calculated according to (17) [22]. (17) Where λ is the experiential weight, (0 < λ < 1), S ra (c) is the intra-cluster and Ser(c) is the inter-cluster similarity for the cluster c i .…”
Section: Clustering Fitness Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metaheuristic algorithms use predefined objective function to lead the solution toward the optimal one [50]. The objective function directly affects the quality of the results [55]. Thus, considering the best objective function is very important, and is not an easy task.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The BPSO is used to solve a wide variety of problems including feature selection (Cervante et al 2012), cryptography algorithms (Jadon et al 2011), optimum switching law of inverter (Wu et al 2010), and classification (Cervantes et al 2005). Several algorithms have also been developed to improve the performance of BPSO that includes modified BPSO which adopts concepts of the genotype-phenotype representation and the mutation operator of genetic algorithms (Lee et al 2008), mutation-based binary particle swarm optimization (M-BPSO) for multiple sequence alignment solving (Long et al 2009), improved binary particle swarm optimization to select the small subset of informative genes (Mohamad et al 2011), density-based particle swarm optimization algorithm for data clustering (Alswaitti et al 2018), Particle Swarm Clustering Fitness Evaluation with Computational Centroids (Raitoharju et al 2017), hybrid binary version of bat and enhanced particle swarm optimization algorithm to solve feature selection problems (Tawhid and Dsouza 2018), hybrid improved BPSO and cuckoo search for review spam detection (Rajamohana and Umamaheswari 2017), and hybrid PSO with grey wolf optimizer (HPSOGWO) (Singh and Singh 2017). In any case, original BPSO (Kennedy 1995) effectively stick into neighborhood optima because of single directional data sharing system by the global best particle in the swarm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%