2023
DOI: 10.1111/1755-0998.13751
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Particle size influences decay rates of environmental DNA in aquatic systems

Abstract: Detecting macro-organisms using environmental DNA (eDNA), especially in aquatic ecosystems, is quickly becoming one of the most prevalent environmental monitoring methods for the detection of single target-species (e.g.,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Aggregation of smaller particles transitioning to larger ones is also a possibility, such that what we are measuring as slower removal of large particles could actually be the replenishment of large particles by the aggregation of small particles. 44 Water Column Removal Rates Varied by Target. For larger particles (>10 μm), tetW had higher water column removal rates than all targets across all treatments, while for smaller particles (>0.45 μm but <10 μm), removal rates for tetW and ermB were similar and typically higher than bla TEM .…”
Section: ■ Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Aggregation of smaller particles transitioning to larger ones is also a possibility, such that what we are measuring as slower removal of large particles could actually be the replenishment of large particles by the aggregation of small particles. 44 Water Column Removal Rates Varied by Target. For larger particles (>10 μm), tetW had higher water column removal rates than all targets across all treatments, while for smaller particles (>0.45 μm but <10 μm), removal rates for tetW and ermB were similar and typically higher than bla TEM .…”
Section: ■ Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, we see higher removal rates of ARGs associated with small particles compared to large particles, which could simply be a surface area phenomena, with more “sticky” surface area, or biofilm, associated with smaller particles. Aggregation of smaller particles transitioning to larger ones is also a possibility, such that what we are measuring as slower removal of large particles could actually be the replenishment of large particles by the aggregation of small particles …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This difference in mechanisms of removal between large and smaller eDNA components is an important and novel finding that may help explain spatial–temporal changes in the eDNA composition observed in the field. The longitudinally variable eDNA composition hypothesis predicts that eDNA components will change predictably in their relative proportions over time and space, thus enabling prediction of target organism location and abundance with eDNA size data. Accordingly, the variation of eDNA particle and fragment size with decay has been previously observed in a small number of studies. Therefore, linking removal rates of different eDNA components to variation in environmental factors is fundamental for future modeling of eDNA transport and removal associated with downstream transport in flowing waters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The longitudinally variable eDNA composition hypothesis predicts that eDNA components will change predictably in their relative proportions over time and space, thus enabling prediction of target organism location and abundance with eDNA size data. Accordingly, the variation of eDNA particle and fragment size with decay has been previously observed in a small number of studies. Therefore, linking removal rates of different eDNA components to variation in environmental factors is fundamental for future modeling of eDNA transport and removal associated with downstream transport in flowing waters. For example, in a rapid-flowing, low-nutrient environment (e.g., a mountain stream), we may expect large eDNA particles to persist longer in the water column, whereas in a slow moving, high-nutrient environment (e.g., a wetland), large eDNA particles will be removed more rapidly than small particles, and the presence of large particles will be a stronger sign of a proximal eDNA source.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation